last night asked that investigators regain access to 125 documents found in that search of mar-a-lago. that is part of the extraordinary appeal to cannon s order which politico puts like this, it aims to a full-throated rebuke of the ruling by cannon, a trump appointee who was confirmed to a seat after trump s defeat in the 2020 election. prosecutors used the filing to describe her ruling as a danger to national security and one ignorant to the counterintelligence work and lacking in an understanding of the complexities of executive privilege. all of it and the bid to continue to use the classified documents from mar-a-lago in the investigation amounts to a bold gamut from doj. once again, from politico, quote, they re going forward with an appeal despite the risk of cementing an awful precedent. we re getting an even worse ruling from an appeals court dominated by trump appointees and they re daring cannon to double down on analysts that legal analysts on the right and left
keck tiff bank, and it means you deblow they supervise it both and the consequences, by the way, and this is another thing that s been underreported. if you make a mistake on the attorney-client side you can be absolutely taken out of the case. so if she were going to have the same framework for executive privilege and no one knew what she would have it would be huge consequences, but look, i agree with frank and with politico. it s scorching in substance, but two points to note. they really wear a kind of a velvet glove here. it is, you know, in its own way, yes, they call her a public enemy, basically, but if you can do it, they do it sort of respectfully, cleanly, straightforwardly, and it s not a kind of pol amickal brief,ing and two, the remedy they served