recent cycle and i think there is a consensus that it was wrong for sarah huckabee sanders to be asked to leave that restaurant. i base that largely anecdotically on what i heard from radio listeners on what i heard across the country yesterday. the question becomes, okay, what are the party officials then going to do with those facts and i think that maxine waters really did throw gas on this fire, make it a heck of a lot worse. the president s response to with waters is a bit of a roarshack test. was he saying maxine, be careful what you wish for because you might be the victim of violence or harassment or was he saying, this is terrible, you re going to bring about the harassment of public servants. i happen to think it was in the latter category. apparently chuck schumer heard it. i m going option a. given from what we heard from the president before and he always uses that phrase, be careful here, when warning people. yeah. that s an old-school like, you
president try to stir the pot, throw gas on the fire as you put it, versus trying to put the fire out and allay everybody s fears. we re the biggest, stronge, greatest economy in the world, and we re going to get through this just like we have every other time, but this president has proven that this may work in community organizing, but it does not work in running legislatively the greatest nation on the face of the earth. and he needs until he comes to grips with that you ll hear more rhetoric. when i hear extortion and hostage, do you know how the markets ear acquitting that? they re saying, my gosh, i ve never heard anything like this in the history of the country. neil: sending a signal to them that right now a crith they thought would pass maybe won t pass, or at least both sides are so entrenched it will be hard to pass, if it does pass it is equivalent of a default happening, which the marks know