United on eight justices who did endorse the disclosure current requirements. Only Justice Thomas dissented in that decision. I know it doesnt look very hopeful i think that congress is the way theyre on a deeing regulation trend until the Supreme Court. What can change normal terms of obama or anyone else couldnt even get through nominations for regular courts though Supreme Court. The president ial elections do matter. Hi, im jim. My question deals with roberts vote on the health care issue. Do you think he was motivated by the fear that the court began to look like a political entity rather than a jurisprudence entity . Youre welcome to speak to this too. Its probably one of the most common questions we get, isnt it . Yeah. Do i think so . No. I take him at the word. I take him as sincerely trying to grapple with the issues presented in that case. I think he was first inclined to vote with the four conservatives and strike the law down as violating the Commerce Clause. When they cam
Investigative agencies. With a raid into was a situation that was really upside down. Normally they would try to find evidence and then find out what is going on and they found nothing. They couldnt find any crimes. So they did file a report saying that we dont have anything on these guys and they had seen most of them as being like dirt farmers. Sort of an agricultural bounty of afghanistan. [inaudible question] is rhythmic that all of these legal issues arise in context with the situations for all of us. And its great that we can learn about our systems of justice from this. Particularly for the folks that are being prosecuted. Given that the administration has made clear that even if they are found innocent, they have shaped the case. And if you do conclude that this is theater for the entertainment of americans are we finding that the real aim for one of the things coming out of it is there is a use of these to control how this is told by the media and exemplified by how tightly th
You talk, i like that. So my question then would he part of what you are talking about Oliver Wendell holmes was sort of mentally above it all in a sense of like that. Is that a major area to freedom of speech across the world like you know this dictator, we dont like this that a good thing because they seem to be above it all and we can bring it down to our level by physical force as we can talk like Oliver Wendell holmes. We can ring it down to our level by physical force so was that a great narrative to freedom of speech back then and now . The detachment and the difficulty breaking through to people. I suppose it could be. On the one hand it seems like your question gets at, should we be engaged in more aggressive diplomacy is supposed to force as a country clacks on the other hand, the question might be taken to ask you now is what it takes to advance free speech or for free speech to become personal to people . To the extent that that is what youre asking i think that is kind of
To rise to 37 for workers who hit 67 to train the three and 2042. The rise is more dramatically long wage income from 41. 92 not 48th. If you like it which rental income we have housing income and that arises from 46. 4 to 84. 8 . This illustrates the fact because of the collapse of defined benefit pensions, Social Security is perfect date to be an important and came in the decades ahead. Something we have to be aware of. The last party want to make within reference to the elderly Consumer Price index. If you go back to the decision to index Social Security, presumably the 1975 intention of insurance seniors preserve theirs entered a flipping. The elderly and taxes in tended to track the standard of living, prices paid by the elderly has is consistently within two tenths to three tenths of a percentage point more rapidly than the overall cpi primarily because the more rapid growth in health care costs. By contrast, the proposal to switch to the chained Consumer Price index is literally
President of the cox communication. That is followed by a Research Analyst interview. Here is john skipper up first. What is the biggest competition for espn and in 510 years now what do you see as the biggest competition . There is a lot of competition and always have been. The leagues have their own networks. A lot of attention is playing because fox sports is going to have a new station and nbc launched one a year and a half ago. There are conference networks. Turner, cbs and we have a lot of competition and mostly competition for programming right or talent for advertising dollars and eye balls as well. Where does it go from here . Oh, i think it will get more complicated and competitive. Everybody understand that sports and live sports is the sweet spot of media and almost the only thing you have to watch live. And it might be social media sites doing tweeting about sports. Other Cable Networks and everybody understands the rights are valuable. And espn available on all devices .