I think you just took a narrative stance . Which means he has more time to write and more time to talk and more time to educate all of us. I am honored that he has come here again and he was here a couple years ago. I am honored that he was back today. [ applause ] two i hope we have time for questions and answers. They can state a popular memory, largely as betrayal and popular media. I want to look at the politics of the betrayal of Andrew Johnsons impeachment. My primary works would be Thomas Dixons klansman. And john f. Kennedy run the kennedy room. My thesis is that these were for trailed as part of the misrule. Although political factors inevitably influence impeachment under the misdemeanor, only theres been a legal trance aggression. Because many of you know the reschedules of senator with personal principle patriotism and bylaw over partisan politics. This one chapter on johnsons impeachment which as most of you know failed by conviction by one vote. These are the illustration
Ago. And i am honored that he is back today. [ applause ] thank you. Im going to get about 25 minutes, i hope you have time for question and answer. Reconstruction is a lie in the popular memory. Largely through its portrayal in popular media. I want to look at the politics of the portrayal, of Andrew Johnsons impeachment. My primary work will be Thomas Dixons the politics of popular portrayals of Andrew Johnsons impeachment one, john f. Kennedys profiles in courage. My thesis is, that these works portray a radical reconstruction , and reinforce the once highly held belief that although clinical factors inevitably influenced impeachment, under high crimes and misdemeanors, should occur only if theres been a legal transgression threatening the welfare of the republic. Lets start with the 23. Is me if you know, was a Pulitzer Prize winner 1957. With sketches of senators with personal cost, over partisan politics. Theres one chapter on johnsons impeachment which is most of you know failed
Public library. It seems all you need to do these days is turn on the television, and you can quickly hear what Alison Kibler talk about tonight, which is hate speech. Reality television to the nightly news, we see examples in the headlines that show that hate speech is alive and well in our country. Some would argue hate speech has a long and difficult history and our country, but also has a long way to go for improvement. Others say it pits equality and free speech against each other. Alisons book is examining how our society has changed since the early 20th century to verbally reflect the country we live in now, one nation, under all. Hate speech is a complex issue and i am proud to be part of the Kansas City Public Library, a place where, every day, offers a forum and an opportunity to engage and examine complicated issues, and debates, especially about free speech and the desk and equality. It is what a library is designed to do. Alison kiblers book is a great place to start. She
Some would argue hate speech has a long and difficult history and our country, but also has a long way to go for improvement. It pits equality and free speech against each other. Alisons book is examining how changed sinces the early 20th century to , the country we live in, one nation, under all. Hate speech is a complex issue and i am proud to be part of the Kansas City Public Library, a place where, every day, offers a forum and an opportunity to engage and examine complicated issues, and debates, especially about free speech and the quality. It is what a library is designed to do. Kiblers book is a great place to start. She is a professor of american studies and womens and gender studies at franklin and marshall, can currently at work on another project that is focused on second wave feminists and television reform. Particularly, their use of the federal communications ,ommissions fairness doctrine pressing television stations to improve the representation of women and feminism. Pl
What im asking you to do is match the controversial expression with the way that the expression has been regulated recently. These are within the last 23 years. Give me a couple eat a couple minutes, then i will take responses from the audience. You can talk to your neighbor, if you want. Ok. Lets try to get some answers out there. Does anyone want to get started . Lets go through all three . Ok, go ahead. The second one down matches the redskins name. Dr. Kibler thats true. What is at stake is something called the lanham act, which forbids the trademark, a trademark cannot be disparaging to a group of people. That has happened, and is being appealed. There is an Appeals Court recently, it struck down that act, but it will continue to be litigated. The redskins issue is kind of in play. Does anyone else have one that they feel certain about . Ok. Correct. Remember what university and was . Ok. The university of oklahoma expelled the fraternity, and the students who sang the song. And t