Material and troops were sent in there. For some reason will send them in and invited 70,000 japanese troops in. There is a concern given russias respect for history or maybe not respect, or an awareness that things like this. I could see that being an additional driving force in concern for protecting the arctic. For the most part, the airbases are airstrips are just not overly threatening. As i understand it except for submarines has been no ice capable naval ship. There is construction of coast guard ships but those are not armed like on National Security. So to me it still looks like a domestic approach to the arctic, not and outward looking, but a local defense activity. So i just throw that out as important because when we say military, we think aggression. When we say coast guard, we think that sun. As i look at it, i see much more of that. Once you get away from where they have submarine in the strategic issue. If you could talk about how russia really perceives that and whethe
Lets start with the global level and the most important implication at the global level is the increase in Oil Exports Iran as a result of lifting sanctions. See, when sanctions were tightened, when the European Union tightened sanctions in 2012, there was a precipitous trop in iran positive will exports by roughly a Million Barrels a day. For laterso notice that the opposition of trading partners also shifted. In the tradewas with western europe, whereas trade with partners, the oil exports to eastern partners increased in some cases in proportion was much larger. We set as a first approximation t irans oil experts exports were going to grow by about a Million Barrels a day in thet six to 12 months after accord is ratified. Expect isat people the time needed to bring production backup to this level. We took that assumption of a Million Barrels a day and simulated it in a alltime country equilibrium model, multiple countries trading with each other, then we insert an additional Million
Still trying to come to terms with the loss of one of its own. Flags flaying at halfstaff here as drivers take to the track for their practice runs. They had a few days to come to terms with the tragic turn of events. Safety concerns are at the forefront. And while the drivers are dealing with wilsons death, they remain steadfast in their understanding of the risks in their sport. Every place we go, indycar and the tracks, they are trying to make everything safe. We still got to remember it is racing. There is the dangerous factor of it. Indycar has done a good job with the cars and the safety. Our safety crew is really good. I think motor sport is dangerous and we know the nature of the sport, i do, i feel 100 safe. Last big step in safety for open wheel racing. What do you do with an exposed head. That is the question. Yes, i mean, they have got to find a way. I think it will take time but got to try to understand what is realistic. Reporter a veteran driver was one of wilsons Close
7rgt is a very compelling case. We could do that less directly but it is pretty easy to understand. To see the campaigns in junior high school. So the political economy at its best is understanding the American People has specific diseases. But we have guessed out very well at talk about the importance. See you have been more involved than any of us. How do we square that circle of the congress that is imperative, results, and measurable now to build over time . That is the question in some ways has been haunting me for several years. I have had quite a bit of time to talk to the bilateral response as well as the global fund to fight those three diseases with considerable debate with the global fund to which they should be supported as opposed to deliver responses to find out why so much more politically attractive with those tax dollars to lead to a specific outcome. I dont think if the conversation will be about a direct Bilateral Program with the nebulous investment and to be persua
Voting booth is the way republicans are talking about it. They are talking about the failure of the leadership and a list of examples. They are not railing on ukraine, but saying there is a narrative they are trying to build about them being a failure and they can use this as a check mark. Can i offer a slightly contrarian view . One of the surprising things about the ukraine and russia situation is the extend to which they have not headed for the exits. Putin very cleverly created a golden opportunity for them to do that. The nato meeting was happening and he creates a ceasefire. The terms of which he dictates himself. He claims she not involved in the conflict. Nevertheless he said heres a ceasefire that works this way and this way. Just as everyone is gathering. They dont do what i expected him to do is say a ceasefire. Lets back off. They went the next step. Maybe its not enough and as much as it should have been, but we have very little economic skin in the game. But they did. I t