you get what you get, you. so you get what you get. and anderson in norm, listen, if the script was flipped in this case, right if that juror that you just read had those same feelings about joe biden? joe biden was on trial, right the other sayyed would be losing their minds right. about getting fair and having a fair and imbalanced trial. look, this is a very important case. i think we should we should try. they should move the venue. they should struck the judge. if you want to if you want to have a serious case about this or you can just have a kangaroo court that s what s going to play out. and that s how it s going to be perceived by americans. norm, as we mentioned, the foreign presence request for a stay of the trial pending a venue change was denied by a statement the appeals judge say trump s attorney argued that seating a jury this quickly in this climate was so many prospective jurors being dismissed over bias or self acknowledged bias or should point out was untenable. doe
foreign aid bills on the floor. there s also just a lot of concern about the chaos of yet another potential motion to vacate and the harm that could do to the institution long-term. a few feeling certainly shared by many republicans as well. so what happens now so the house is going to vote tomorrow on these foreign aid bills that is likely to pass with the support democrats. and then it s going to head over to the senate the timeline a little less clear. there. the senate is scheduled to be on recess this next week, so it s something they could pick up after the recent that s and president biden did say he would sign these bills if they come to his desk, but some of the things anderson that we are watching out for tomorrow are does marjorie taylor greene finally forced this floor vote on the motion to vacate, do any more republicans get behind her and importantly, as we mentioned to democrat, step up and say, they are committed and willing to saving johnson speakership. so just a
eisen, who investigated trump is counsel to house democrats in the first impeachment and litigated cases involving him previously, he s also the author of trying trump a guide to his first election interference, criminal trial david, you ve been saying all along, you don t think the foreign president can get a fair trial in manhattan, is it that you just don t believe those 12 jurors and six alternates when they say that they can t be fair. fair. and judge, the case in the facts hey, look, anderson, i think it s a tough it s tough situation, right? everybody believes, i think in their heart, they can be fair, but they come, they come to this case with their own set of biases. and and if you just look at the demographics, almost eight and ten people in manhattan voted against donald trump so if you re, if you re one of those folks, i don t know how the jury breaks down, but i m wondering who they voted for. and if you didn t vote for the former president i think you probably come to tha
just exist and perhaps that underscores the fact that we won t know more. the way that ambiguity works, but it also still sort of leaves those tensions out there. the tensions still exist. the red lines are both israel and iran misinterpreted on each other sayyed about striking those are now blurred. and the stakes are just as high. i think as they ever were anderson. yeah. robertson in israel for us tonight, nick, thank you. i m joined now by former israeli ambassador to the us, michael or an investor or i mean, it seems after last night strike events could be on a d escalatory path. do you think this explosion in iraq i mean, is it worrisome in that it could change the equation if there was a miscalculation or misunderstanding yeah. hi, good to be with the i just said there s always i don t think so. i think it s clear to israel was not involved in the iraqi explosion. it would be a very sharp turn from that longstanding israeli policy. we
is not whether the other information that prosecutors might want to cross-examine trump about show that he s a terrible guy. that in fact is supposed to be not the purpose. the purpose is to show that he s dishonest, that he lacks trustworthiness. so if you look at the various things prosecutors are trying to get in, i think the judge will allow prosecutors to ask him about the civil fraud trial, perhaps defaming e. jean carroll, then you get into sort of more distinct, separate stuff like the frivolous lawsuit against hillary clinton feels like a stretch to me so i think the judge is going to do what we ve seen him do quite a lot of which is little bit for the prosecution, little bit for the defense. and then that ll inform donald trump s decision whether he s going to testify. i am still a solid absolutely not. but this may further that decision. judge jones, do you see anything wrong with the speed or the proceedings so far? no, i don t see anything wrong at all. anderson and as