exist and perhaps that underscores the fact that we won t know more. the way that ambiguity works, but it also still sort of leaves those tensions out there and attention prince still exist. the red lines are both israel and iran misinterpreted on each other s sayyed about striking. those are now blurred and the stakes are just as high. i think as they ever were anderson yeah. robertson in israel force tonight, nick, thank you. i m joined now by former israeli ambassador to the us, michael or an ester or i mean, it seems after last night strike events could be on a d escalatory path. do you think this explosion in iraq i mean, is it worrisome in that it could change the equation if there was a miscalculation or misunderstand it yeah. good to be with anderson as always, i don t think so. i think it s clear that israel was not involved in the iraqi explosion. it would be a very sharp, turn from that
response. the vote today on steve bannon s podcast as we have completely lost confidence in his leadership now that he is allowing hakeem jeffries& chuck schumer to completely control the house, basically save a civil war has broken out in the house of representatives we all need to be asking the most concerning question. what has mike johnson made a deal to do? what has he promised he will give them in the future. and this is why we have to remove mike johnson from the speakership because he has made a deal melanie zanona joins us now from capital hit with the latest on the threat to johnson s speakership. so what is the state of play between johnson, marjorie taylor greene, and company well, anderson, this is shaping up to be a real showdown between speaker mike johnson then and his right flank. and it could really all come ahead, come to a tomorrow. republicans are furious that johnson has had to rely on democrats stout every step of this process to try to pass this package of f
building in downtown shreveport and meet with this man and the oil and gas its business. a lot of things that are happening today in this country remind me or what happened back in the 90s and all of you a slob, you al versa. hey, chick is from bosnia and says he immigrated to the united states three decades ago in the midst of the sectarian war which led to the breakup of yugoslavia it was a beautiful country. people were getting along a lot of good people in the divisiveness between politicians have caused a major war. and a lot of innocent people suffered in this office in this congressional district. we ve talked to a lot of people, one and republicans and democrats to work together and in this case, republicans and republicans, it s not good to be throwing, throwing bombs at each other instead of just, let s work together and move forward. anderson this is, like johnson s fourth term and congress his first three election wins. we re not close. his fourth when in 2020 he ran un
selfish self-serving, though she didn t tell the judge she could put all that aside and be fair. should the judge number accused her for cause i don t think so. anderson, this was one of the most searching scrutinise of each of these jurors that you could have asked for it, the judge s scrupulously fair tara, at times, i thought he was too fair to donald trump and he asked these jurors over 40 questions. they were examined, re-examined by the parties look, donald trump is a very well-known and very polarizing figure. but americans take it very seriously when they promised to be fair and independent. and i have seen juries over my decades of practicing law set aside that stuff that happens outside the courtroom. we also saw a huge number of jurors who said they couldn t be fair, over half of each of the two
outspoken as president trump. there s nobody that doesn t know him in this room. in the afternoon, the court moved to a routine hearing to determine how much of trump s legal history the prosecution will be allowed to ask him about if he testifies, which he said he plans to prosecutors argued they should be allowed to question trump about the findings in the e jean carroll defamation case hey, it s among others, despite trump s attorneys strong objections, the former president shook his head as the prosecution spoke about how he defamed carroll when, will the judge, actually decide if prosecutors can ask the former president about his past legal cases so, judge number sean said that he would rule on this on monday, likely before opening statements get underway, know trump s lawyers also tried, again to try to learn who the prosecution s first witnesses who they expect to call after openings. the prosecutor said that he would give them the name on sunday, but if it showed up on social