that we visible, everybody seems to know that we are kinship carers, they don t that we are kinship carers, they don t say that we are kinship carers, they don t say what is that any more. i certainly don t say what is that any more. i certainly think we are being hopefully more valued than previously. hopefully more valued than previously- hopefully more valued than reviousl . , ., , ., hopefully more valued than reviousl . , ., , ., previously. let s hope we have shone a liuht previously. let s hope we have shone a li . ht on previously. let s hope we have shone a light on what previously. let s hope we have shone a light on what you previously. let s hope we have shone a light on what you and previously. let s hope we have shone a light on what you and others - previously. let s hope we have shone a light on what you and others do - previously. let s hope we have shone a light on what you and others do asl a light on what you and others do as kinship carers. thank yo
russia. there was talk on russian social media of these mystery fires, where are they coming from? i have to say ukrainians don t admit to it, clearly they are sending helicopters and drones into russian country, taking out key strategic targets, taking out things like oil depots and logistic places. it is hard to know what is exactly going on. but the reason we are seeing more of it is because of the most strategic and tactical aims of the ukrainians. whilst their territory is under direct assault, their aims have to do things to carry out things that make their fate easier, rather than things that are vindictive and an assault on russia for the sake of it. so we see them taking out targets that essentially make the war effort within ukraine s border easier by making russia s task more difficult. it is risky. to be on the offensive is much more dangerous than being on the defensive, so i think ukrainians are doing it, but they are doing it in a measured
that in withdrawal from afghanistan put that in question. it has come together that in question. it has come together in a very strong way, the coherence is absolutely there. the coherence is absolutely there, and if it was not to continue there, and if it was not to continue with this, then you would continue with this, then you would have to ask the question what would have to ask the question what is would have to ask the question what is nato for? there is very much what is nato for? there is very much a what is nato for? there is very much a strategic imperative and if the much a strategic imperative and if the worst happened and russia if the worst happened and russia did take over the whole country. russia did take over the whole country, then putin is encouraged to look at his own vision encouraged to look at his own vision of encouraged to look at his own vision of what he sees as the new vision of what he sees as the new soviet union and who is next
top of this issue because the home secretary has been dealing with it for years and years. so the question is exactly how long will this take and the telegraph says that borst also won at some of their labels to begin by the end of the month but now the home office appear to be blaming potential legal challenges, so whether or not that s true we have to wait and see what they don t say which legal challenges and how long they can take but is convenient for the government to blame that. and this robot a policy of course someone he had lied to the time and that will be the case. i someone he had lied to the time and that will be the case. that will be the case. i was happy with the home that will be the case. i was happy with the home to that will be the case. i was happy with the home to terry that will be the case. i was happy with the home to terry when - that will be the case. i was happy with the home to terry when she | with the home to terry when she announces with the hom
hours and hours but we don t have time, but is there a world where the elon musk owned twitter, really really free speech and the new uk regulations for online safety which are going to be quite strict, actually, that those two things can exist at the same time? don lane safety bill is there to hold organisations, platforms like twitter to its own at and conditions. track on acceptable. they don t say, we allow racism, misogyny, abuse, bullying, misinformation, disinformation on the platforms of course it doesn t, but what the online safety bill is about is that legally they abide by those terms and conditions, and that is fundamentally the substance of the bell. so the online safety bill, elon musk and twitter, what is he going to do? abide by his terms and conditions and do what he says or change them? what i would say algorithms,