for charly, this is from preethi, who asks. do you think russias war with ukraine, whenever that will end, will lead to a more united europe despite the tragic loss of lives? yes, i do. yes, ido. both yes, i do. both europe as an idea as well as the european union. i think it will be psychological, but also practical in terms of how we cooperate. whether it is on energy, defence, security, i think it is a great tonic also to the kind of post kabul withdraw anxiety we have had in europe and transatlantic relations with the us leadership. from a finnish perspective it is easy to see that it has improved. the uk s response is genuinely improved its image in europe, showing the uk wants to be part of europe, even if it is not part of the eu. europe, even if it is not part of the eu- of the eu. shorn, let s bring ou in. marie wants to know. at what point do we in the west, say enough ? putin is destroying a country and sanctions are not stopping him. when is enough enough? there
that in withdrawal from afghanistan put that in question. it has come together that in question. it has come together in a very strong way, the coherence is absolutely there. the coherence is absolutely there, and if it was not to continue there, and if it was not to continue with this, then you would continue with this, then you would have to ask the question what would have to ask the question what is would have to ask the question what is nato for? there is very much what is nato for? there is very much a what is nato for? there is very much a strategic imperative and if the much a strategic imperative and if the worst happened and russia if the worst happened and russia did take over the whole country. russia did take over the whole country, then putin is encouraged to look at his own vision encouraged to look at his own vision of encouraged to look at his own vision of what he sees as the new vision of what he sees as the new soviet union and who is next