If Brett Kavanaughs confirmed to the Supreme Court it will have profoundly negative effects on workers rights, Womens Rights and Voting Rights for decades to come. All i can say within an hour and 18 minutes of your nomination, you became the biggest threat to democracy. In the eyes of some of the most partisan people in the country who would hold kagan and sotomayor up as highly qualified and would challenge any republican, vote against them. You live in unusual times as i do. You should get more than 90 votes but you wont, and i am sorry it has gotten to where it has. Its got nothing to do about you. If you dont mind, and you dont have to, what did you tell your children yesterday about the hearing . They did as they ill tell them what they told me. They gave me a big hug and said, good job, daddy, and margaret, before she went to bed made a special trip down and gave me a special hug. I just wish if we could have a hearing where the nominees kids could show up. Is that asking too mu
saying g, i ve never known a president who had so much control over my everyday decisions in my life. that s really bad, not just for joe biden and kamala harris, for the democratic party. we have more people calling themselves republicans now then since 1994 when you had a much more popular president and bill clinton and they still lost 54 seats in control of all three chambers. they ve got a problem all the way around. all this nonsense about putting kamala harris in the supreme court, she is unqualified for that job. she was rated the most liberal senator above bernie and elizabeth warren. and she also disqualified herself just by politicizing the vaccine. being so extreme on abortion. when trump was running for president, he put out a list of 21 people, men and women, with names, and backgrounds. you can research them if you want to do. i m going to choose from this list if there s a supreme court. and he did exactly that whereas joe biden is coming up with
i mentioned this to jeanine pirro. the jump has thrown out sarah palin s case against the new york times, which said they had defamed her but suggesting her pac had something to do with the shooting and killing of six people including injuring of gabby giffords. sarah palin won this in the court of public a opinion, a lot of damaging material came out about this editorial accusing of of political incitement in a mass shooting and has not make the new york times look good. it s always been the case that it would be difficult for the former governor to win this suit because she s a public figure and there s a supreme court standard about proving malice. and why the judge would send the case to the jury and said she s not proven the case as a matter of law. apparently what we ve been told, allowing the jury to continue to
right to life movement may have chosen, they have been two despite attorneys, neither identifying as opposed to abortion, so if you let anyone sue you can t control the message, i think there has been more of a sense among conservative governors it is better to wait to see if there s a supreme court will reverse by the summer of 2022. how does this directly the future of roe v wade? the suweme future of roe v wade? the supreme court future of roe v wade? the supreme court has - future of roe v wade? tue supreme court has the future of roe v wade? tte supreme court has the case future of roe v wade? ttj: supreme court has the case in front of it now, out of mississippi banning abortion at 15 weeks gestation. the reason it is a big deal as the court could have taken less explosive cases but it took this one, and probably with the intent of upholding this law. the reason that a significant is roe v wade says there is a right to choose abortion until friedel liability which is around
ago. took all that time and supreme court decision to finally force the ncaa to make some changes. last week they cleared the way for so-called student athletes to at least earn money off their college careers. still will not be paid for playing. joined by someone else reporting on this injustice as long as we have, sports editor for the nation. dave, walk us throughout changes. there s a supreme court decision which allowed some minor compensation through scholarships, and then the decision that ncaa made, just explain what those do. first of all, the supreme court decision which brett kavanaugh sounded like big bill haywood, laid it out. hoping for federal government to codify it greater but the head of the ncaa who makes $4 million a year, ncaa is listed as