for greg s icy trim that s worthy of a fantastic monologue. greg: wait. that s not what i ordered. you left something out. sorry, greg. yes, you don t get this brilliance on special report. in your face bret baier. gutfeld rules. greg: yeah. that s more like it vocal guy. still there are big changes afoot and not just ainsley earhardt quitting smokeless tobacco. here s not watching. boils down to one word, limit. we ve reached that. yep, we ve put our foot down like a drunk paul pelosi running a red light. let s start at the beginning. the recall of the ss school board members. after years of wokeness, voters finally put their sorry asses to sleep. remember they wanted to change the names to schools during the covid crisis, the voters told them to hit the road, and in san fran, that road is covered with [bleep]. there s netflix telling its employees if you re too sensitive to work here, don t. god, if i had a nickel every time i said that when i was directing those snuf
air marshals off planes and put them off the southern borders, right, our dollars going up. so many things in this world consuming americans that are true stressors and yes this is what is consuming our administration. this is what our tax dollars are funding, their hair catching on fireman man i wouldn t knock the ayatollah s tweets. this he are pretty good. did you see his top ten list of christmas movies. emily: is hunter biden s movie on there greg: scrooge was number one. he didn t have a christmas story on there. charlie pleasure seeing you as well. what do you make of the fact that they re so scared? i really do believe this has to do with hate speech now being brought to include anything disagreeable. charlie: oh, i think you re exactly right. and what s so amazing about it is to listen to people in the press. they re the ones the most upset about it. you know and if you step back and you take something like twitter, which is kind of the
like it. and that s what s happening. greg: it took a long time. jim you are a media may venn do you miss the ads back in the village voice. jim: i made a lot of great friends there greg: don t you think there s a place for a good local newspaper? because we forget. i think a lot of the reasons why there is a lot of crime and stuff is because there s no local crime reporters anymore. jim: i never liked the local i was in the local paper when i was 13 for playing asteroids, i got in the local paper for paying ten hours in 1981? that was in your book. jim: yes i was dressed like adrian from rocky had the glasses and hat. anyway it s a long story i ll be around after to talk about it if you want. i don t care about their opinion, instead of shutting everybody up just higher people with a variety of opinions. the editor giannis the written version of the guy swishing wine at the party. just tell me what happened and shut up about your opinion.
there is questions and concerns about whether or not that has been tampered with whether or not the russians have removed things from the scene. then there is some questions about specific intent. did they intend to shoot down a commercial aircraft or with were they trying to shoot down something else? is it t. doesn t matter. the law won t excuse it. transferred intent. all the things we have to look at to determine who should be held accountable and whether or not we can can create a nexus between this act of terrorism and directly tie it to russia. greg, the soviets did this twice. once in the carter administration. one in the reagan administration. i don t think this is what putin wants. a commercial airliner going down. i think it probably was a mistake. it doesn t help him. it doesn t make it look good. i don t think he really cares at this point. because the international community is not coalescing to stand up to him. and when we saw the europeans, they tried green energy. it
concerns about whether or not that has been tampered with whether or not the russians have removed things from the scene. then there is some questions about specific intent. did they intend to shoot down a commercial aircraft or with were they trying to shoot down something else? is it t. doesn t matter. the law won t excuse it. transferred intent. all the things we have to look at to determine who should be held accountable and whether or not we can can create a nexus between this act of terrorism and directly tie it to russia. greg, the soviets did this twice. once in the carter administration. one in the reagan administration. i don t think this is what putin wants. a commercial airliner going down. i think it probably was a mistake. it doesn t help him. it doesn t make it look good. i don t think he really cares at this point. because the international community is not coalescing to stand up to him. and when we saw the europeans, they tried green energy. it didn t work. now they