and this week was a most embarrassing charade yet. plus, stopping another santos congressman ricky torres joins me to discuss this legislation that would block politicians like george santos from lying to voters, and the hit swell they just keep on coming. fox has been slept with another defamation lawsuit, we ve got the details of their latest legal debacle. i m ayman mohyeldin let s get started. this week after four months of endless investigations, weeks upon weeks upon conspiracy arnold fox cameos, and countless promises of seismic revelations of a soprano asked biden family criminal enterprise, james comer and his republican allies from the house oversight committee held a crop press conference to announce, wait for it, nothing. nada. zilch. no evidence connecting president biden to any wrongdoing whatsoever. all of that work and in unity produces five-page memo showing no specific allegations of a crime committed by biden, or any of his relatives. in other words, it was
fox has been slapped with another defamation lawsuit. we have the details of their latest legal debacle. i m ayman mohyeldin, let s get started. this week, after four months of endless investigations, weeks upon weeks of conspiracy adult fox cameos and countless promises of seismic revelations of a soprano-esque biden family criminal enterprise, james coburn and his republican allies on the house oversight committees held a press conference to announce, wait for it, drumroll please. nothing, nothing, zilch, no evidence connecting president biden to any wrongdoing whatsoever. all of that work and innuendo to produce a 65-page memo showing no specific allegations of a crime committed by biden or any of his relatives. in other words, it was a flop and that is good news for two reasons one, we obviously don t want the then vice president to be tangled in criminal activity. and to, it makes this years-long smear campaign against joe biden harder to continue. and that was the whole
twitter under his leadership. i see it on my own site, ugly stuff. horrible stuff that i am sure was brought before so i won t even go into it or give it life. but it is bad. and you know tucker carlson, he s a professor of hate. i don t how he got this way, you have to have a shrink tell you how he got this way. but he is dangerous because he feeds into the worst instincts of people and he encourages them not to be afraid to think things that are harmful to the society. racist things and anti-women and it s a very dangerous kind of philosophy so legal issues aside and i am not a lawyer i can t say whether he has a like to stand on. i just hope he doesn t get on to any platform that doesn t
lawyer professor there barbara that in discovery there may be some proof here and if there is there going to be in trouble all over again. barbara, tucker carlson s lawyers trying to argue that this twitter move wouldn t violate his contract with fox by saying that they breached it first. could carlson be opening himself to legal troubles with this move? it is a risky move on his part? we ll certainly anytime you initiate a legal conflict it does open yourself up to all kinds of things in discovery, to depositions, to sharing of documents, email messages and text messages. he may be gambling that fox already has of those communications so maybe he isn t so worried about that. but it seems like this is one of those places where he is using the strategy of the best defense is a good offense.