alex. i can t wait to see what you have coming up next on this. thank you, my friend. i can t wait for you for the next hour. all right, alex. have a good friday night. you too. so, how is that weaponization committee going? you know, the house republicans big jim jordan, matt gates project, the special select subcommittee that was going to expose what exactly? it seems like jim jordan doesn t even know. now one republican s trashing the subcommittees process as, quote, very much amateur hour. speaking to on the condition of anonymity they added that airing this quote, stuff on live television would make us look like morons. [laughter] here is congressman dan goldman, a democratic member of the subcommittee in an actual former prosecutor who has actually worked on actually vest geishas. when they come and testify, you ll have exit access to the transcript like everyone. you mean your staff isn t gonna turn it over to our staff? we re just in the? back when the
so, how is that weaponization committee going? you know, the house republicans big jim jordan, matt gates project, the special select subcommittee that was going to expose what exactly? it seems like jim jordan doesn t even know. now one republican s trashing the subcommittees process as, quote, very much amateur hour. speaking to rolling stone on the condition of anonymity they added that airing this quote, stuff on live television would make us look like morons. [laughter] here is congressman dan goldman, a democratic member of the subcommittee in an actual former prosecutor who has actually worked on actually vest geishas. when they come and testify, you ll have exit access to the transcript like everyone. you mean your staff isn t gonna turn it over to our staff? we re just in the dark? when the transcript is done where going to give you the transcript. i mean the dozens of whistleblowers we ve already talked to you or staff. what you want me to do with th
unbiased, when actually all it means is that the bias is already structurally built-in. right. and you write in your piece, quote, instead of counseling, if it ain t broke don t fix, it originalism instructs, if it still broken you still can t fix it, a prescription for permanent crisis in america, unsolvable in the present because they were not solved in the past. gun violence is just one example of a crisis that is getting worse while the court is loosening regulations on guns. how can the courts ignore this? it s really troubling and problematic. they are basically using this theory of constitutional interpretation, originalism, as an out to just do what they would ve wanted to do anyway. and secure their preferred policy goals rather than actually interpreting the constitution in a way that makes sense and protects all of
unsolvable in the present because they were not solved in the past. gun violence is just one example of a crisis that is getting worse while the court is loosening regulations on guns. how can the courts ignore this ? it s really troubling and problematic. they are basically using this theory of constitutional interpretation, originalism, as an out to just do what they would ve wanted to do anyway. and secure their preferred policy goals rather than actually interpreting the constitution in a way that makes sense and protects all of americas residents equally. the next question i was going to ask you was, originalism was just justice sullied owes reason for overturning roe v. wade, a justice thomas going after contraception and gay rights using the same interpretation.