alex. i can t wait to see what you have coming up next on this. thank you, my friend. i can t wait for you for the next hour. all right, alex. have a good friday night. you too. so, how is that weaponization committee going? you know, the house republicans big jim jordan, matt gates project, the special select subcommittee that was going to expose what exactly? it seems like jim jordan doesn t even know. now one republican s trashing the subcommittees process as, quote, very much amateur hour. speaking to on the condition of anonymity they added that airing this quote, stuff on live television would make us look like morons. [laughter] here is congressman dan goldman, a democratic member of the subcommittee in an actual former prosecutor who has actually worked on actually vest geishas. when they come and testify, you ll have exit access to the transcript like everyone. you mean your staff isn t gonna turn it over to our staff? we re just in the? back when the
so, how is that weaponization committee going? you know, the house republicans big jim jordan, matt gates project, the special select subcommittee that was going to expose what exactly? it seems like jim jordan doesn t even know. now one republican s trashing the subcommittees process as, quote, very much amateur hour. speaking to rolling stone on the condition of anonymity they added that airing this quote, stuff on live television would make us look like morons. [laughter] here is congressman dan goldman, a democratic member of the subcommittee in an actual former prosecutor who has actually worked on actually vest geishas. when they come and testify, you ll have exit access to the transcript like everyone. you mean your staff isn t gonna turn it over to our staff? we re just in the dark? when the transcript is done where going to give you the transcript. i mean the dozens of whistleblowers we ve already talked to you or staff. what you want me to do with th
response to january six committee and apparently a similar budget, and they have nothing because there is no there there. it s also a waste of taxpayer dollars and in our time it s not what our constituents expect us to be doing to trying to help donald trump come back to the white house. they expected to make their lives better. the subcommittee is doing nothing to help with that. and today at cpac pant gets called for defunding the police, and, quote, abolishing the doj to cheers from the crowd which brings me to a basic question. what is this committee about? i don t think they know, except that they are trying to do whatever they can to delay the groundwork for donald trump to come back to the white house. these are trump loyalists. and the only reason, jonathan, that this subcommittee was formed, was it kevin mccarthy could become speaker and this is the deal that he made to have jim jordan on his side and
alex. i can t wait to see what you have coming up next on this. thank you, my friend. i can t wait for you for the next hour. all right, alex. have a good friday night. you too. so, how is that weaponization committee going? you know, the house republicans big jim jordan, matt gates project, the special select subcommittee that was going to expose what exactly? it seems like jim jordan doesn t even know. now one republican s trashing the subcommittees process as, quote, very much amateur hour. speaking to on the condition of anonymity they added that airing this quote, stuff on live television would make us look like morons. [laughter] here is congressman dan goldman, a democratic member of the subcommittee in an actual former prosecutor who has actually worked on actually vest geishas. when they come and testify, you ll have exit access to the transcript like everyone.
transcript. i mean the dozens of whistleblowers we ve already talked to you or staff. what you want me to do with them? their names? notes? did anyone take notes? i ll be happy to talk with the ranking member on how we handle that information. thank you. in that clip, congressman jim jordan claimed to have spoken to dozens and dozens of witnesses about the, quote, political nature of the justice department. it turns out, according to a report released by democrats in the house judiciary committee, based on interviews conducted by republican staff, the first three witnesses interviewed sound like absolute kooks. they don t even for the definition of a federal whistleblower. the 316-page report concludes, quote, we are able to draw a number of striking conclusions about the state of the republican investigation. first, the three individuals we have met are not, in fact, whistleblowers. none of these witnesses has provided evidence of misconduct by the fbi, the department of