about to fall in beyond recession.n: he deals with the economic crisis, a major crisis. f you disagree with health care but that s what we did. okay. now we are talking about republican majorities that are not dealing with the issue as it stands. you get people talking about what jesse is saying.ue you can bring up a discharge position. republicans are saying they will go to paul ryan who supported and get it discharged so they can get it going immediately.y. even in that circumstance, what you are going to have is history of donald trump saying this is not about the law when it comes to my friend joe arpaio. it is about the law when greg: we ve heard that comparison over and over again. juan: i m going to keep bringing it up. greg: it steers themp argument away from this. juan: i thought it was about the law?
themp do and some of them don t. jared and ivanka are subject to all the rules so they ll have to avoid a lot of policy matters to stay out of trouble. and i hope they do it. they have a very good lawyer, private lawyer, but they do not have very good counseling in the white house counsel s office. up until just a few days ago, the white house counsel s office tried to pretend that ivanka was not an employee, that she could just sit around as a volunteer performing official functions with a security clearance and an office and communications equipment. that is just flat out wrong. so i don t think they ought to trust the white house counsel s office to keep them out of trouble. it s not a good situation right now. we ll have to see how this all unfolds and what role she ll play in the administration. richard painter, thank you for joining me. coming up, lindsey graham facing tough questions in the heart of trump country. what s got them fired up. plus, we dive into the intelligen
we re showing you, put this into context for us. fairly typical response for the capitol police to move fast when something like this happens? exactly the way they should respond. a lot of possibilities. we don t have the answers. but sometimes people try to beat the barricades, you know the vehicle barricades, maybe try to drive around them p. and the united states capitol police, 1500 or so officers who protect the capitol and the blocks around the capitol would try to stop that vehicle. you could have a capitol officer ramming the vehicle to stop it or come up to prevent the person from skirting the barricade. and your reporting there at the scene from casey about shots fired at the vehicle. officers could have also, you know, if the vehicle tried to move again after being rammed fired shots at it. so they re trying to prevent anybody from getting through the barricade. that s exactly right.
decide it on is the basis of precedent as you pointed out. for a judge, precedent is a very important thing. you don t go reinvent the wheel every day. and that s equivalent point of the law of precedent. we have an entire law about precedent. a law of judicial precedent. precedent about precedent if you will. that s what that 800-page book is about. expresses a mainstream consensus view of 12 judges from around the country appointed by, as you point out, presidents of both parties, great mind ss ss. justice breyer was kind enough to write a forward to it. it makes an excellent door stop. and in it we talk about the factors that go into analyzing precedent. any consideration of precedent. there are a bunch of them. you ve alluded to some themp. the age of the precedent. the reliance interest that built
are an employee? it is a felony.. you have journalists asking regular people to advance a story and a narrative, it is sick. also saying last year, he was willing to go to jail for five years if he could get trump s tax returns. he is setting themp example that illegal acts and leaks should happen if we can get the story and that is a sad state of journalism in 2017. tucker: for myself, i always want more information. if satan handed me relative information, i would run with it. but i m frightened by theseat federal employees who have so much of our information, intimate information, would be leaking in order to hurt people they disagree with politically. that is scary from behind a cloak of anonymity.. i cannot imagine anything scarier than that.