taking away the voters choices in maine. here in maine and across the country, regardless of whether they like donald trump or not, bellows is wrong on so many levels, and it s getting to the point of being really embarrassing. but, if the state law, the state constitution makes it so that if someone has a complaint about a candidate, they take it up with the secretary of state, who is then the arbiter, how could she be in the wrong for making a decision based on what was presented to her in that hearing? well, you know her decision process was just wrong. she is there to support maine s voting rights, and she is doing exactly the opposite. we are going to fight this thing to the highest extent that we be to, and what she is doing is flat out wrong. why would you say that? do you object to donald trump s
A majority of Florida voters — including more than half of Republicans surveyed — told pollsters they support a proposed amendment that would add a right to abortion to the state Constitution. The poll from the University of North Florida’s Public Opinion Research Lab, released Thursday, found 62% of state voters said they would vote “yes” if the measure appears on the November 2024 ballot. .
both the pilot and crew member are recovering from injuries. no one hurt on the ground. in mississippi tonight, six white former law office everyones have pleaded guilty to state charges for torturing two black men. prosecutors say michael jenkins and eddie parker were assaulted, jenkins also shot. authorities say that woman was one of the victim s childhood friends. now to the climate crisis tonight, and a victory this evening for young americans fighting to make sure authorities do more to protect the next generation. a landmark victory for the group who sued kwlaming the state of montana failed to protect them from climate change. the plaintiffs aged 5 to 22 based their case on the state constitution. this decision means that officials will have to consider greenhouse gas emissions when issuing permits for oil, gas, and coal production. the state does plan to appeal. when we come back on this busy monday night, the very close call tonight.
in wisconsin, a stinging dissent by the by the supreme court justice in the state ofns wisconsin, a34 case. threy that his fellow justices were not following the law. ces ar or in pennsylvania, the state constitution had very, vere ycomes rules as it comes to the issueto of voting by mail. and they tried to circumventtri thatto of amending the constitution by merely passing legislation. and these are legitimate questions, professor, of from a legal point of view, they are. and all he has to prove is that he understood and believed whether he was right or wrong. now, the real question is where the trial takes place. everybody has already said it s going to be in columbia. we know the judge, obama appointee. that s not certain. tost certion is lawyer will make will be a change of venue to northern virginiaai,
you balance or whether or not you have in person voting or, you know, all of those things, you know. so the number of different machinations that could have been launched was infinite and now this provides a check on that. the state constitution s state courts now are empowered to police that as they always have been. laura jarrett, supreme court really likes to push it to the very end, don t they? they sure do. they sure do. on the edge of our seats. we got another day at it, it seems, thursday. what else are we waiting for at this point? we still have some major opinions left to come. not the least of which is a challenge to affirmative action as we know it in this country. cases against harvard and usc and the court is expected to do something much broader than that or at least it has the potential to, which would be to ban it nationwide, if they decide to go that far. we also are looking to see what the court does when it comes to the president s student loan