i have been pushing hard with the justice department. you gave me a letter. did the fbi ubt view you? 10 plus hours. right around the time. but the fbi did not. how much times do you think you are mentioned in that report? according to the letter, the press release by chairman graham about the fact that it s coming out, and also the fact that they will have the hearing on december 11, it mentions me directly by name. it s public knowledge it s all about you. it s about whether they have sufficient evidence to wiretap you, surveil you. er 90 days they had to guy the judge evidence of further evidence. do you have any idea of what that further evidence was? it s all made up evidence. that s the problem with the people that are mentioned in
firearm and began providing emergency medical care, the press release also identified the officer as white male who had been with the police department since april of last year, the police department s didn t give further details of firearm located inside the woman s house, also texas is an open-carry state, the woman who died has been identified as 28-year-old tatiana jefferson, a neighbor called the police department s nonemergency number for welfare check because the lights were on and door was opened. i didn t say it was a burglary, i didn t say people were fighting, i didn t say anything that would make them think that they needed to have a gun, all they needed to do was knock on the door. the police department s major case unit and internal affairs are investigating the shooting, the officer who fired the
pay yourself first. get paid every two weeks, first thing do you is put money in one of your nest egg accounts just for retirement. julie: i have to get to bernie sanders inequality tax plan. you have the press release in front of you. julie, the press release says it all. sanders related income inequality tax plan. his plan would increase taxes on greedy companies that pay ceos 50 times more than median workers. that s what the press release says. greedy companies. you get a smack in the face on the ceo who may make much more than the average person but that s also misleading. oftentimes that salary includes stock. they re given stock oftentimes the ceo and leadership team will be given stock and that means you will do as well as the stock does. in other words, your performance will be reflected in the stock which will be reflected in your salary. to say greedy keys off the bat you lost me. he is partisan. julie: his tweet last week
law. the president said he would disobey all subpoenas from congress and they have done that. that was article 3 of the nixon impeachment, by the way, for doing that. the law says that the internal revenue service shall give anyone s tax returns upon to the chairman of the ways and means committee. they simply refused to do it. they are with holding information from congress, from the american people, that they are bound by law to supply. this is just another instance of their being contemptuous of the law. the press release cites the watergate era and says an agreement was made at that time that when something like this happens, congress would get it. they promise to handle the type of information that can be of national security level confidentiality the right way. but what does the law say about what is supposed to happen in this situation? well, certain information, i am not an expert in that part of the law, but certain information must be shared with the intelligence committe
congress and they have done that. that was article 3 of the nixon impeachment, by the way, for doing that. the law says that the internal revenue service shall give anyone s tax returns upon to the chairman of the ways and means committee. they simply refused to do it. they are with holding information from congress, from the american people, that they are bound by law to supply. this is just another instance of their being contempttuous of the law. the press release cites the watergate era and says an agreement was made at that time that when something like this happens, congress would get it. they promise to handle the type of information that can be of national security level confidentiality the right way. but what does the law say about what is supposed to happen in this situation? well, certain information, i am not an expert in that part of the law, but certain information must be shared with the intelligence committee and only the intelligence committee.