idea that this is a danger to the health and safety of americans. and we re trying to give the american people the ability to speak up in their own defense. and say, we really are scared by this man. we are extremely unhappy about his behavior. and we need to get rid of him. quick final question. fox won t run your ad. why did you spend the money there to begin with? well, i wasn t one of the people figuring out the ad strategy. but i talked to them, of course. so, let me say this, we placed that ad in media channels all over the country. hitting all different kinds of viewers. and fox has a very particular kind of viewer. and i think that the people who were placing the ad wanted to make sure that those people saw the ad. got access to the information. and they knew there was a chance the president would see the ad on fox & friends and they felt
democracy. might you be helping him, might you be helping him in so far as the trump base sees your ads, can t help but the whole country sees your ads and they interpret your ads as the legitimate turnover of election that we just had and they then become emboldened in their support of donald trump? i think what we re trying to do is not to be smart. not to make political calculations about which segment of the population would this appeal to. which segment of the population would this annoy, but instead, we re trying to do something very different from that, michael. we re trying to do the right thing. and we re trying to do the moral thing. because we think it s important. and we are not trying to figure out how the gain is going to going to play out because partly, we don t think it can. we re really just focused on the
unprecedented danger. so is this not a matter of policy or dislike of his health care, or his taxes. or anything like that. this is a president who is a clear and present danger to the american people. i think everybody in washington, d.c., including members of his party recognizes that. i think members of his administration absolutely recognize that. and in fact, we re seeing, senate republicans, trying to take away his ability to unilaterally use nuclear weapons base th because they know it s true. in the ad you say he s brought us to the brink of nuclear war. bringing us to the brink of war that s not treason or bribery, some would argue it s a situation he inherited from
when i had this discussion and broke the news that you had shared with me on radio, there were more than one caller who had the mind-set of saying i m for getting rid of the ban that president trump seeks to reinstate. but why should american taxpayers pay for a vaginoplasty? and maybe you just anticipated that question. but what is your answer to that? it s pretty simple. it s health care. you know, we can t pick and choose what we are going to provide for our military members based on political controversies. you know, this is medicine. and there s science and there s facts. it doesn t take long to go i know this is hard for people to wrap their head around, but it s not just me acting like a rogue physician. this is what is established by the community of professionals in this country. and around the world, frankly. 18 other countries have had
to mar-a-lago, it s a minute amount of money. and if you want to talk about the plightability, and take all of those 17 patients and see how many lost days of work, it would be 17 for all of the patients. we want this surgery that s an active duty military now for $100,000 and 500 lost days of work. compare that with the tweet dr. mcginn, thank you for coming back and closing the loop on this story. yeah, you re welcome. people need to hear it. still to come, this week a half dozen house democrats introduced articles of impeachment against president trump. as of now, they don t have the votes but billionaire tom steyer has been putting his money behind impeachment movement? will he help sway public