he deserves great credit for the value places in that, but you re right. i mean, listen, there s testimony that was given here. you want to talk about scary. there s testimony given here that the fbi uses its criminal investigator in guest investigative authority, national security authority, fizer, the patriot act, executive orders and so on to monitor social media and to make coerce them, let s say into changing them. but for anyone who thinks it is appropriate for the government to be involved in that process , let s say you think it s justified by terrorism concerns or public health. cern s you should be troubled by the success that this administration has had with issues like coercing and forcing social media facebook, twitter, etcetera to take down posts that they found the administration found unflattering about joe biden didn t like the way she was portrayed or other personal things affecting the biden administration, perhaps
power that makes that possible in the first place. after all a lot of the politicians who are pissed off about the power of the feds in the wake of the mar-a-lago raid are the same people who have voted to reauthorize the patriot act. a lot are the same people, in 2018, voted to extend section 702 of fisa which is this provision that led to the nsa sur veiling americans without warrant. and i m against that kind of snooping, whether it s done by the government or those cameras greg puts in brian kilmeade s dressing room. and in 2018, some of us did have concerns. there s really no protection for americans in this. i understand that if you re a foreign contact you don t have constitutional rights. if you re someone talking to one of those people and you re wrapped up in it they don t have to get a warrant to get your information. also, the constitution says this isn t allowed. okay, judge. kat: it s not in the constitution. don t applaud her it s my show.
powerful law enforcement agencies, libertarians over here like yeah, hillary has been talking about that, if you are concerned about federal law enforcement agencies potentially being politicized, you should not talk about how that s made possible, i have seen a lot of people talk about it, the same people repeatedly voted to reauthorize the patriot act. so i hope that there is something to be learned in terms of what can happen, regardless of what side you are on when these agencies have this kind of power. would you be okay with expanding the fbi? the fbi has far too much power, far too much power. i will admit, that i am probably one of the people you are talking about in the sense that you know, now they are using the patriot act or they are ready to track down citizens in the united states in this