this attorney mark elias is in a precarious position. he was the general counsel of the campaign. two reporters have accused him of expressly saying there was no relationship with the clinton campaign and the dossier. he was actually sitting next to john podesta when podesta made the same denial. that gets you into very difficult area, that s when false statements are given to federal investigators. that has to be of concern. it doesn t mean that crime occurred but it s an obvious concern. can you think of an alternative explanation? i will take off the table the idea that the head of the campaign and the head of the party didn t know about millions being spent on opposition research. is there some other way they could explain their behavior before that committee? well, that s what the investigators really have to look at. it s hard to argue that this isn t appropriate for investigation. there are serious questions here. it doesn t mean there s crimes
this attorney mark elias is in a precarious position. he was the general counsel of the campaign. two reporters have accused him of expressly saying there was no relationship with the clinton campaign and the dossier. he was actually sitting next to john podesta when podesta made the same denial. that gets you into very difficult area, that s when false statements are given to federal investigators. that has to be of concern. it doesn t mean that crime occurred but it s an obvious concern. can you think of an alternative explanation? i will take off the table the idea that the head of the campaign and the head of the party didn t know about millions being spent on opposition research. is there some other way they could explain their behavior before that committee? well, that s what the investigators really have to look at. it s hard to argue that this isn t appropriate for investigation. there are serious questions here. it doesn t mean there s crimes
you re right. this attorney mark elias is in a precarious position. he was the general counsel of the campaign. the new york times reporters, two of themou have accused him f expressively saying there was no relationship with the clinton campaign in the dossier. he was actually sitting next to john podesta when podesta made the same denial. thatat gets you into very difficulto area, that s when false statements are given to federal investigators. that has to be of concern. it doesn t mean that crime occurred but it s an obvious concern. m can you think of an alternative explanation? i will take off the table the idea that the head of the campaign and the head of the party didn t know about millions being spent on opposition research. is there some other way they could explain their behavior before that committee?co well, that s what the really have to look at. it s hard to argue that this isn t appropriate for investigation. there are serious questions here. ithe doesn t mean t
a way. they were real normals and then be given the country to experience could hit us in fact it was the latin american country with the highest rate of them and i make that you know city what was irrational in a country as politicized as believe the area where the unions were so strong was to believe that because their little group of guerrillas was hiding in a forest things would spread the way they did in cuba. but it had the cuban experience firmly in mind. he had arrived in a country he didn t know nor did he ever know about all of the previous political work that had been done by castro in cuba i guess. i can buy it about your mom almost a million more to get to know so good to have one smarty among jay who was secretary of the bolivian communist party had received orders from moscow by letter for the
prove it to us. we ll have to say. one thing about the special elections, they are going to be forgotten pretty quick. it s about trying to judge how the nba playoffs will come out based on a game in november. it s just it s not all that important in the great scheme of things. it s more of a news cycle or two and the news move on and next waving of polling comes in and we re a long way away from the meaningful elections. steve, there s one interesting thing you vntd raised yet and that is on the democratic side at least, there s been a real success in raising money for the candidates, not from the party, the party didn t start james thomps thompson, the candidate in kansas, but grass roots raised a lot of money and in georgia, the democrat there has raise a record amount ofmoney. that just shows you tha as we saw with bernie s campaign and barack obama s campaign, there is a lot of grass roots energy