majority. now the reality is, britain is officials and the national hurricane center. neil: senator, you ve been through these hurricanes a lot. still heading to brexit. a lot of people let their guard the governor is determined to down since it was ratcheted down to a category two. implement that. but it s hugging the coast, there s a brewing rebellion within parliament of the idea of moving very slowly. a no-deal brexit. among the slowest moving there will be a big vote likely hurricanes we ve seen in your tomorrow on this. but the prime minister i think neck of the woods since 1965. so people sort of say, all is absolutely right here that right, the worst is over. the will of the british people what do you tell them? well, look, we didn t get a must prevail. they voted to leave the european direct hit. union in june 2016. okay? this has done to us, the bahamas, we re having a 17.6 million voted for that. different conversation. that doesn t mean there s threat this government is
you re right. this attorney mark elias is in a precarious position. he was the general counsel of the campaign. the new york times reporters, two of themou have accused him f expressively saying there was no relationship with the clinton campaign in the dossier. he was actually sitting next to john podesta when podesta made the same denial. thatat gets you into very difficulto area, that s when false statements are given to federal investigators. that has to be of concern. it doesn t mean that crime occurred but it s an obvious concern. m can you think of an alternative explanation? i will take off the table the idea that the head of the campaign and the head of the party didn t know about millions being spent on opposition research. is there some other way they could explain their behavior before that committee?co well, that s what the really have to look at. it s hard to argue that this isn t appropriate for investigation. there are serious questions here. ithe doesn t mean t
flynn. wanted to speak about is he under investigation. he never really wanted to get the inside story about russian involvement in the election. i think that s because we con inflated two things. one was the whole collusion. he s told a number of people there was no collusion. we sometimes conflate that. he says that s still an open question. he says he s not going to a pine. he says michael flynn is under criminal investigation. but from that standpoint, that doesn t mean there s collusion. in fact, many of the people that i have talked to but they have concluded that but apparently this investigation is still going on and mueller the new special counsel has his work cut out for him. at least i counted five times comey suggested the president of the united states and his aides are liars. well, here s the thing. when we look at calling someone a liar, we have to understand the intent.
harass her? > of course. but you re saying he s empowering women and that s not what i said. i said the way donald trump has treated me and the way i interact with him and the people on his staff wait a minute. people on his staff have sued him and he has settlements for large sums of money. well, when you settle doesn t mean there s merit to the claim. just like bill o reilly said he settled the case because just the allegations out there can be damaging. you think he gave up half his income for a year because he was afraid of some allegations against him? i m saying he wouldn t want accusations like this floating around him. i think he would pay money to
would guide us to the right decision. reporter: doesn t mean there s an easy choice. there s some element that i m entering into territory that i don t totally know what the consequences are. what the moral consequences for me if we don t act, this isn t a moment to be standing idly by. pretty incredible all those people you were able to find and that man and his story as a jew and how he feels about doing this. when you were talking to that pastor, how likely is it that they will go after these religious leaders. technically under the lou it s possible. let s look at reality. if you look back into newspaper reports or court records when the last time that the federal government decided to go after somebody of the cloth who might be offering sanctuary to someone, you have to go back to the early 1980s. the optics here when we talk to people about the reality of it, the optics don t look good for the federal government to go in and put a pastor in handcuffs for this, especially