District attorney as well as Making Threats against Law Enforcement officials according to Court Documents filed a day earlier in u. S. District court in Salt Lake City. He owned numerous firearms including a sniper rifle. The complaint laid out his history of threats on social media. Other subjects of mr. Robertsons threats, Attorney General merrick garland, governor gavin newsom of california, letitia james, the new York Attorney general. This at a time donald trump is directly going after prosecutors who either indicted him like jack smith or alvin bragg or maybe on the verge of doing so. Like fani willis. Donald trump airing a Tellvision Add in atlanta and other tv markets attacking the Fulton County District Attorney charging him with his fourth criminal indictment. The new ads released Sunday Accuses Willis of previous wrongdoing. Also names attorneys who already brought charges against trump including manhattan District Attorney alvin bragg and Special Counsel jack smith. Now, n
tried in multiple jurisdictions? it s tough, but you don t do yourself any favors when you go on all the sunday morning talk shows. well, you have time to prepare and do that, but not enough time to prepare future a hearing? and that s one reason why judge chutkan said we re going to do this friday, and you re going to be there. and you know what? they re going to be there. yes. we know why they did the full ginsburg. in as much there is a case they are going to bring to court, there is a case they are bringing to the american people, which seems to be at this moment what they are actually focused on. that s why that email i mentioned earlier that really becomes important. trump would say look at all these things that are happening to me around the country. look at all these people coming after me. this can t be a good thing for democracy. look at what the democrats are doing. but i am curious to see how and hear now how the democrats message this on their end. because it goes to
the problem with bringing a case like this in the middle of campaign. the government has no evidence of criminal intent. i m just representing a client. i m ensuring that justice is done in this case. president trump is entitled to his day in court, and he ll get it. he asked him in an aspirational way. asking is covered by the first amendment. if you re going talk about the law, you have to understand what the first amendment says and what it stands for. hi again, everyone. it is 5:00 in new york. i m alicia menendez in for nicolle wallace. a flurry of appearances on talk shows by trump s attorney, all in one day i should add, which came as the guidelines over what donald trump and his legal team can say publicly about the federal election interference case still being worked out in court. tomorrow we will get a clear picture of what judge tanya chutkan will allow defendant trump and his legal team to say. chutkan ordered the prosecution and defense to appear before her
mr. de la vera s attorney will get clearances and participating in the classified information procedures act hearings. i think this judge who s been more slis tis, of course, of mr. trump than some would like to see saying no. move along. not having until august 21st. let s get this started. back to the original request for evidence to be reviewed on a skiff. doj prosecutor said this, the government is not aware of any case in which a defendant has been permitted to discuss classified information in a private residence in such exceptional treatment not consistent with the law. sort of irony of trump asking to use a facility at the very same place where he s accused of mishandling documents in the first place. it s honestly just mind-boggling that after being charged with not safely handling these materials at his estate, trump is saying, hey, pretty,
this isn t the first time we ve seen this, as you know. you know, after the search at mar-a-lago there was an attack and attempted attack on the fbi in cincinnati. so there s others like that. that is, it s very hard for law enforcement to know which threats online are going to materialize into actual physical, you know, attempts. frederic, in the room where those conversations happen and threats are assessed. talk to us about how those decisions are made ordinarily, and the complications of making those choices in this moment? yeah. the in this moment part is something worthy of lots of discussion, but let s address how the decisions are made. first of all done in concert with the u.s. attorney s office, of course, who s going to have to prosecute a case if they agree charge. in this case three federal, distinct federal charges that were applied here in the arrest warrant. a big factor here is specificity as to be target, time, method