says. there are manhattany of laws in indiana and states across the country with anti-discrimination laws already on the books. martha: a form appellate court judge writes it does not give them trite discriminate against gay customers understood this law. there are a lot of forces going against indiana on this. they are saying that they will work to clarify the law to make it more clear for people who think that it s misinterpreted or don t understand the letter of the law. i think we all should across knowledge that religious freedom is a bedrock american principle. but there are always limited principles even to our constitutional rights. i have the freedom of speech but there can be a law that prohibits me from yelling fire
documents, it says unclassified documents as well if she signed it. that document says that she should have - are we holding her to are lower standard than others who work at the department of state? if she didn t sign it, is that a nenl. it s purely a violence of policy and rule it s not a legal violation. so she escaped criminal liability there. u.s. code section 2071, what is that. that is a federal criminal statute that deals with the destruction, the removm of federal documents, if you take documents out of chambers or you take documents out of archive or if you destroy the document. here we have to look at the letter of the law, versus the spirit of the law. did she violate the letter of the law, possibly, if she had
motivated against her. is there a difference or did the rules change between when colin powell was there and when secretary of state hillary clinton was in that position? the issue there were some regulation adjustments and it does appear there were regulation adjustments in 2005 and 2009. there were changes, poppy. what s very clear is that even if folks on hillary clinton s side can prove that she did not break the federal records act here which is entirely possible then we wouldn t actually know because she has controlled these e-mails. even though even if she didn t go against the letter of the law, she went against the spirit of the law because even back in 2009 when she was secretary of state, the whole idea of this act was, if you use private e-mail to conduct government business you need to turn it over put it into the state department recordkeeping
runned by a former bill clinton aid. the question remains whether clinton s e-mail practice followed precedent and the letter of the law. the washington post headline this morning says she did not follow white house policy. what i can tell you, guidance has been given to agencies all across the government which is specifically that employees of the obama administration should use their official e-mail accounts when they re conducting official government business. however, when there are situations where personal e-mail accounts are used it is important for those records to be preserved consistent with the federal records act. yesterday kond lee za rice s aid says she used an official account while secretary of state. whereas a spokesman said general powell used a personal e-mail account during his tenure of secretary of state. he was not aware of any restrictions nor being recalled
government address, raising questions about the security risk and whether she may have violated federal requirements. the federal records act requires e-mails like hers to be preserved but the paper reports her staff took little action to do so. two months ago aides sifted through the account and decided to hand over 55,000 pages. why are they making the decision. i don t understand. why are they making the decision. it s not their decision to make. a clinton spokesman told the times secretary clinton complied with the spirit and the letter of the law. richard haass, is that true or not? well, again, the material when you work for the u.s. government is it s theirs. whether you send someone on emoji she did not apply by the spirit of the law, she did not apply by the letter of the law. this is not a close law. willie, this is staggering. it is. it doesn t have much of a press sent. i know we re going to talk to mr. schmidt about this. archivists who worked for m