better question and better dialogue back and forth to the state department finding out where the prime minister netanyahu is coming from where state department is coming from and somewhere in between we ve got to find a deal that prevents them from iran from getting a nuclear weapon. that s the bottom line. you know what i was asked the question yesterday, willie. i said it s wrong. how they did it was wrong. you can t make right out of the wrong. it was done. that s what i m trying to say. two wrongs don t make a right. that s what i ve been trying to tell mika but she just won t listen to me. let me ask you real quick. what do you think about the president suggesting that he s not going to let the senate have a say on this deal on this treaty? should the senate be involved? should you guys have a vote on this treaty? i really think it involves all of america. it s one of the most important issues of our time, joe. we are elected to represent our people of our respective sta
the speech. don t you think it would be better if we waited a couple of weeks until after the elections and maybe do it on a more bipartisan approach. you know what s going on here right? we re not going to pretend it s not. i think that the timing is the timing and i think i m glad that he s coming. and i m proud to be going today. oh. okay. congressman salmon willie geist. you talked about a good deal for israel, a good deal for the united states with iran. what does that look like to you? heard the president talk again yesterday about a, quote, verifiable freeze on development of nuclear material for ten years. does that sound like a good deal to you? i think that the deal should say basically zero enrichment of uranium. there s tons of countries that have peaceful nuclear programs that do not enrich uranium. i don t believe they should be enriching uranium. matt richard haass, do you have a question? congressman, it seems to me zero chance that you can negotiate a dea
doesn t. it will get there and it will get signed. then there s going to be occasional confrontations along the way. my hope is at the end of the day we make things work. to me that means going back and looking at a coalition where you get a no jr.ity of the majority and a minority of the minority. that s how thing got done when joe was up here and bill clinton was the president of the united states. people have to understand what the rules and what the natural coalitions are. tom, are you going to the netanyahu speech? absolutely. wouldn t miss it. very good. see you there. tom cole thank you very much. still ahead, willie geist, this is netanyahu s, this hillary clinton thing is kind of big, but something much bigger. surprise we waited this long to get to this story. you know what this is what s called the deep tease. should have been the top story of the morning because it s going to be the top story of the summer. it s going to change the way we look at washington, d.c
this deal with iran which i m skeptical about. is it a good deal? if it s only ten years is that a good deal or would you suggest to the white house that they not support that sort of deal with iran? i would not support that deal with iran. if the deal were up on the floor today as it currently exists i would vote against it and i m very skeptical they can get this deal to the point where i could be for it. all right. thank you so much, steve israel. we greatly appreciate it. see you there. joining us now from capitol hill, senator joe manchin of west virginia. good to see you. you will be at the speech today. yes, sir. i understand. what reservations do you have about the deal that the white house and the state department are at least floating out there, this ten-year freeze in development of nuclear material? willie none of us know enough about the deal to make an informed decision right now to be honest with you you. we re hearing tidbits of it if you will. i m going p
agency said, this he s worked at the agency from 2000 to 2013. what you re saying clinton sure supporters spend online, on twitter, everybody does it. that s what actually in a strange way the reporter seems everybody does it. but then you go back and read his own story and you find willie, that again, this is on the front page he quotes somebody saying it is very difficult to conceive of a scenario short of nuclear winter where an agency would be justified in allows its cabinet level head officer to solely use a private e-mail communications channel for the conduct of government business. that s on the front page of this article. short of nuclear winter. then you go to the next page willie, and the article says this is unprecedented. michael schmidt who authored the piece says writes later, colin powell from 2001 to 200058