deviate different policy, those kinds of things. already tonight, just a reminder for folks, inspector general horwitz is the one who did refer criminal charges potentially against andrew mccabe. it is because of an internal referral of his that we know about the page-strzok pet texts that went public. robert, my question for you, do you think that the inspector general will recommend a referral for any charges against the big like comech, or mccabe, which wasdy done in a dferent situation? i think he will make a criminal referral against mccabe, i think he may make it a criminal referral against comey shannon: you do? most of his criticism will be focused on the lack of leadership, will be focused on his dereliction of duty, failure to follow doj protocols, failure to follow fbi procedures, which will reveal a discrepancy and double standards, which will go to the justice committee congressman was saying, that the only explanationor this discrepancy and double standard between
investigation, where in one case there was a real crime that was covered up with the fbi and doj, and the other, there was another crime to attempt one that did not exist, everyone has been prosecuted to the max with s.w.a.t. raids and attorney-client privilege record rates and everything else, the only reason to explain that is e double standard, the weaponization and picization of the department of justice, fbi, the nationalurity intelligence apparatus by the obama administration, of which comey s handling of clinton reflects. the key aect is, there is clear differences between what comey says that mccabe said about who authorized certain leaks end of the horwitz concludes that it s comey who lied, then it will be mey who is referred for criminal prosecution. shannon: do you think there is any chance that the underlying investition into hillary clinton s handling observers, emails, classified information, that gets reopened? harry, to you first. i think very unlikely. it s a whol