county courthouse website had put up a list of charges, among them rico racketeering, conspiracy, etcetera, etcetera , um, professor dershowitz, let s start with you and let you respond. why did they go with that? well first of all, that we should take it all seriously. the fact that it was a grand jury indictment, it means nothing. it s the prosecutor who indicted the best evidence of that is that who s on his website before the grand jury even voted now the whole strategy of all these four cases is to get a conviction before the election , even if they re going to lose on appeal. i used to teach my students, many of them future prosecutors. if you bring a rico case that increases your chances of winning a trial and losing on appeal, the same thing is true with conspiracy and other cases involving mental states. and so all four of these cases are designed to get quick, quick convictions in jurisdictions that are heavily loaded against donald trump.
filed by the clerk. the clerk has acknowledged that we can expect that we will find out who is been charged and what the charges are. we expect that and much, much more. um, but well, we re going to continue by the way with another hour of hannity as we await this breaking news as it comes, but we begin this 10 o clock hour on the east coast. seven o clock on the west coast. this is a fox news alert. we are awaiting full details from portland county, georgia, where a grand jury is now handed up 10 indictments in the trump case. now that indictments remain sealed. we should have details at any moment. you know a little bit of information going out there back and forth . maybe not all 10 or dealing with this particular case. maybe there could be more than 10 people. we don t have those details again. we re going with reports that are widely being disseminated. but we should know. hopefully within this hour we re hearing the indictment will also include possible co conspirators. maybe
going they will never stop unless we said we, the american people stop it for them. if they get away with this, what they re doing right now, this is the way politics will be carried out. erica for the rest of all time. all right, charlie hurt and stephen miller. thank you both for being with us. we re going out to atlanta, georgia or very own. matt finn. he is outside the fulton county courthouse. matt what can you tell us? i guess everybody liked us here are all waiting for this indictment to be unsealed. sean, we are waiting in a short while ago i talked to george chiti. he s an independent journalists who was subpoenaed in this case. he sat inside of the courthouse all day today and told me that he ultimately did not testify. in this case. i asked him if he felt like this case was speeded up today, and he felt like it was because initially he was asked to testify tomorrow. but then he was brought in today.
they have never relented. either whether it was the obama administration or the ah, you know the administrative state at doj and then democrats in congress. they have never stopped trying to pervert the our our cherished judicial system to take take care of a political enemy. and, of course, and stephen makes a good point about republicans. you know, it s part of the problem for donald trump is that he s also taken on republicans, and he s overhauled the republican party and by doing that he had is drawn enemies. you know, in this case in georgia, you ve got you ve got political hacks down in georgia, testifying. with political motivation against donald trump in this case, openly admitting that they hate donald trump, and that s why they re testifying. this is this entire thing is a political hit job and they re
suggesting that i don t need many votes in a recount the change the outcome. it was a natural argument to make. this was essentially like a settlement call, and state officials were pushing back. i think a good faith saying, look , we looked at it. we don t see those votes and trump was basically responded. if you do a state recount. i don t need many votes. you just need to find 11,000. and this entire election turns over now we can all debate what was in donald trump s mind. but is that really the basis of a criminal case? is that what you want? for future cases, elections have been challenged in this country and virtually every election. i ve covered elections for various networks . probably the last 10 or so elections or are always seems that many and every single one we, we would chart and track the challenges coming from the losing party. we never accused