Unindicted co conspirators. What youre watching on your screen is the cover of that page of the indictment if we can put that up on the screen that would be great here. Now, with more we go back to Law Professor and Fox News Contributor Jonathan Turley. Jonathan im looking at that. If you look at the document that made it to the media talking about 10 specific indictments, how do you read it . Using your background as the great Law Professor, you are. Ah well, when youre talking about 10 of diamonds, it has that classic profile of racketeering case thats where willis really gained her fame as a local prosecutor, you often will have large numbers of people linked in a conspiracy to make out that case, you have to establish a pattern. Just a relatively few crimes are may predicate crime list. That is a list of crimes that are the basis for racketeering. I charges in this case they are likely to use crimes like fraud and combine all of these actors in a large sort of comprehensive conspir
them of committing a crime about it. so the question here is what do you have to distinguish this case? there won t create that chilling effect. there s a problem here. by the way. i wanted to flag sean. the greatest danger about a rico case is it tends to be harder to go up on appeal before trial. the reason is that the rico statute is written in a way they are. it s easy to establish these predicates in this pattern. and it s a factual matter. and so it s hard enough to get a court of appeals to rule before a trial and these threshold issues. it s particularly hard in a rico case, so this is going to be a problem for donald trump, not just in georgia in the dc case, the judge there could also make it difficult for trump to take what i think are very strong. constitutional challenges to the court of appeals in supreme court, so we don t know if
pushing and pushing and pushing and all they find is soft jelly . if elected. republicans do not realize the magnitude of what is happening in the liberty that we have known in this country for almost three centuries will be gone. sean, i truly believe that you know our friend charlie hurt mark levin . our mutual friend has set off in that this is a post constitutional america. americans are now asking that question. the house judiciary has a full on investigation. we also have a sort of intertwining investigation in the house oversight committee. um rightly i believe americans are looking at this. looking at the sweetheart deal offered hunter looking at the lack of coverage about joe biden severe lies as a candidate and as a president. involving what are some of our biggest geopolitical foes and literally tens of millions of dollars, you know, finding their way into the biden family coffers, you know, then we have the shell corporations where the funnel and the money through
we re seeing it unfold in front of our eyes. very very tragically. i m not a republican. i m not a trump supporter, but i care deeply about the constitution. i care deeply about preserving the rule of law, and we re seeing it being frittered away for partisan political purposes. let me get your reaction. gregg jarrett. you know, exercising your legal right, sean to challenge the integrity of voting systems is not criminal . it s not a crime to complain , which is what the trump telephone call with the secretary of state in georgia was all about. he was complaining about ballot irregularities. violations of election was a failure of the court to address his petition. it s not defrauding the government if you believe you re acting lawfully, and this idea of bringing racketeering charge seems far fetched. i mean racketeering. as the professor turley pointed out, requires proof of an
going they will never stop unless we said we, the american people stop it for them. if they get away with this, what they re doing right now, this is the way politics will be carried out. erica for the rest of all time. all right, charlie hurt and stephen miller. thank you both for being with us. we re going out to atlanta, georgia or very own. matt finn. he is outside the fulton county courthouse. matt what can you tell us? i guess everybody liked us here are all waiting for this indictment to be unsealed. sean, we are waiting in a short while ago i talked to george chiti. he s an independent journalists who was subpoenaed in this case. he sat inside of the courthouse all day today and told me that he ultimately did not testify. in this case. i asked him if he felt like this case was speeded up today, and he felt like it was because initially he was asked to testify tomorrow. but then he was brought in today.