some went to one office. some to another. in the case of the third discovery, that was separated out. the question is why were they divided and distributed? if this was an inned a investor tent misplacement, it meant they didn t just do this inadvertently, they had to do it repeatedly inadvertently. the other explanation is that these documents were, in fact, used for some purpose like the book that then former vice president was working on. all those questions have to be answered. and just simply waiving them away as inadvertence is not going to do it. todd: you seem to be latching onto the chain of custody issue. i would argue that that makes the biden document situation way worse than the trump document situation simply because trump had secret service and the chain of custody was pretty clear. to your point, jonathan, the chain of custody involving joe biden s will was over multiple years and multiple locations. how do his attorneys defend
is good but doesn t know who at the fbi we should call upon to test and see whether this laptop functions as a point of vulnerability for our country. business deals, kickbacks, who knows what else. that could be used to compromise the first family. i don t think we ought to question this anymore. that s why i introduced the laptop into the congressional record and it will be available for all to see soon. i also filed legislation to strip the security clearances from the 51 national security officials who all lied to the country and said this was russian disinformation. we see that being walked back with yet again doj authorized leaks to see an end. cnn comes out to the investigation to hunter biden is heating up the day after the fbi was stimulated by basic questions i asked the judiciary committee about their efficacy, their work, the chain of custody and questioned her they have about the u.s. vulnerability that could be exploited by our
won t be as many crime scene technicians, the chain of custody evidence type witnesses, but the 90w evidence type witnesses, but the gory details and the surveillance video and the compassion, all of that should still come into the trial, so they are absolutely going to be subjected to the trauma of reliving this horrible, horrible events, and i remember one of the aggravating factor is that prosecutors need to be able to prove to get the death penalty as heinous attractions and cruel, right? while today that s coming have to present evidence that, you know, these people suffered in their last moment, that they knew they were about to die, that he went ahead and was shooting wounded students that he had already shot so they had those moments of pure fear and this cold and calculated manner, so absolutely, they are not going to be spared the gruesome details. david, sta with spared the gruesome details. david, stay with sap spared the gruesome details. david, stay with sap well, spa
start with brett kavanaugh and that nomination. he was steaming toward confirmation and now there is a roadblock. you doctor ford come out one week ago today and basically said she wanted to be heard. republican said , let s hear from her. all we are hearing so far is from her liber team, one of her attorney sang overnight though many aspects of the proposal provided september 21 is inconsistent with a fair and impartial investigation into allegations. we are disappointed with the leaks and balloons that obtain to the process. we are hopeful we can reach an agreement on details. bottom line is we still don t have an agreement. we been wanting to hear from her. will we finally hear from her? first of all, the chain of custody in the first letter was for the democrats. for leaking they can only look at dianne feinstein. i believe it should be released unredacted to the public this
so having one ntsb investigator in kiev, that s better than nothing. but we re a long way from a proper investigation. and david, to that point, you and mary schiavo were talking about earlier in a way that assuages some of the fears. even if people tried to tamper with the evidence, that it would be in a sense impossible to do. you re not going to be able to hide what kind of missile hit it. you won t be able to hide what hit it. there s not a the love mystery here. to destroy that type of evidence, you would have to have a backhoe and a tractor and driving over it. right now you can see. i can see from the photographs, it is probably very well documented. psych from the photographs pretty much what happened and the sequence of the events. i think what s important is when it becomes a criminal case chrgs it appears it certainly will. when that happens and you have to have a chain of evidence and you have to have where it went from, the chain of custody, who took it and what did it