startling details. the devil is in the details. donald trump had no basis, no reason, no legal basis to retain those documents at mar-a-lago. there could be numerous others that are charged, not just donald trump, as well as additional crimes that could be charged. is she kidding me? now, she might be getting that idea from one of the small parts of the affidavit that was curiously left unredacted. like on page 30 where it referred to president trump and those around him as, quote, criminal parties. but still didn t provide any evidence to prove it. it also warned that releasing the affidavit would give trump and his team the opportunity to flee or destroy evidence stored electronically or otherwise. flee? really? trump s plane has his name on it. and destroy electronic evidence. do they mean something like doing, i don t know, deleting 33,000 e-mails? we re going to get into that more in moments with our legal panel. but if anyone thinks that the doj is an impartial
be construed as an attempt to overthrow our entire democratic constitutional order. it s such an interesting point. here are the bureaucrats of the national archives. by the way, the same people who put trigger warnings on our founding documents on the constitution saying that they, trump, the president of the united states, in terms of these documents. well, i think what the revelation was today, you know, this is a document dispute and laid out in detail. what we could see is there was back and forth about whether these documents are classified, whether they re not. trump organization and the lawyers have an argument that they re not and he declassified them. again, the act of raiding a former president s home when this could have been done, the document could have been sought through a motion to compel, through some other means besides a raid, but let s say the raid, they felt, was absolutely necessary and they went in and got the documents. we know from the reveal of the