the u.s. is now apparently standing in the way and then attempting to cover his tracks in front of congress. now that raises a question. did the attorney general, merrick garland, lie to congress thus far ,te the trump appointed us attorney in thids case has been prevented from bringing charges or fully even exercise his authority.t, a in fact, the whistleblowerpo purportedly now hartedlys hard evidence that the testimony you re about to hear from merrick garlan merd is absolutey false and that he knew it at the time. take a look. does delaware u.s. attorney lack independent chargingendent authority over cn criminal allegations against the president s son outside of the district of delaware? he would have to bring ifs it s in another district, he would haveer distr to bring then another district. but as idi said strict, i promie to ensure that he s able to carry out his investigationin and that hd e be able to run itb and if he needs to bring inl
a sitting president . so unless they indict and tryree him before the election, it s not clear how they would proceed. proceed. he can also, by thd.e way, self pardoned for federal s offenses on the state side. theseoffe two statens casese are exceptionally weak. the weakest is manhattanweak.. we don test is manhattanweak.. we don t even know what w the case is . even after the filing oft th the indictment, george ,georgi i think, is very weak. nt the argument that his statementt to go find me theseme votes constitutes a crime, doesn t ficonstitut with with the entire transcript. you know, the interpretation of donald trump will be obvious. he was just telling them that mu was just telling them that to overturn this election. he only needtus to finrnd that number of votes for the election to be overturned. now, you might not agree with that interpretation. rpretatibut there s certainly reasonable doubt there. so the two state the cases, i think, are really fairly anemic.
,others with whomg they disagree, including the oldest newspaper in america, the new york postthe o and it was this jim bakerens who just happens to be the forrest gump of all thesescn scandals. he was the guy behindals.d t the russian collusion with sussmann. and then hd e shows up at twitts and he s he s the guy pushing o the censorship of the new york p post. ost. and by the way, miranda,guess this kind of he calls himself, i guess, a former republican .gh now,is this guy, matt dowd, he s saying that this was all kind of a good thing, thatth twitter did this watch this. what amazes me is the elon, l musk might have spenontirst a little more time reading the first amendment and what ith saidat because, because it s imf thing was this was a violationwh of the first amendment when it sen far as i can tell, no government authority told twitter not to do something. it was amazing to me that all of these sort of fox news ort er whoever else jumped on this without ever fullys what h und
what stinky it keeps getting it keeps getting crazier and crazier at the at the at the bottom line of all this is that these hedge fundsar and corporations that are embracing esg are in cahootse with the biden administration. e to advance their social and climate agenda. we hav ande to go after him forg house republicans have bills ready to go . we get the majority back that simply states that these hedge funds can only investze their money to maximize profits. if you pass a bill that says i that that will kill est gill and that s exactly the republicans are prepared to do. i m going to be leadinto bge le the fight when we get there. laura , hold us accountable to do just that.s and curtis, finally hope. and there might be some little glimmer of hope here, because this week larry fink, again, the big guy who s pushing esg and thd e ceo of citigroup both announced that they will notmate be attending next month s big climate summit in egypt. .so what does that mean?
domestic terrorisme that d is tr the worst threat to america. ica successince the civil war.he coul and so hd e could see from on the ground how the fbi washington field office was manipulating these cases to tryn and expand and pretend thad t the problem was bigger than itde was. adn t and he also didn t want to wantw participate in swat raids.a on people who had just were being accused of misdemeanors, at worst, innocent american and , you know,o inve they were being told to even goo investigate people who hadn t evenington, gone to washington that day. in one case, a man had been at his son s funeral that day, yetd he had fbi agent fs knocking on his door.rv people were beineyg surveilled.. this is just such an abuse ofsai their civil rights. and steve friend stood up w and said, i will notill not did do this. he did everything the righted way. t he complained to his allo his fb supervisors. he told them what fbi rules were being violated and what