would be reversed, giving them another opportunity to blame republicanens. take a look. people think that the president of the uniteicans.d states, ther for debt forgiveness. s he does not. can he can postpone. he can p delayostpon. but he does not have that power. that would tha power t to bef congress. i m prepared to write off the $10,000 debt, but not 50. mr. president, let me ask you, because i don t think i have the authority to do it tigning a two year. yeah. and while the left spent the day complaining about the decisiont spening abou, mant celebrated the victory for millions of hardworking taxpayere victs, including missy senator eric schmidt, who launched thiers lawsuit whem he was attorney general of his state. schmidt wrote on twitter twittet biden s bailout was, quote, fundamentally unfair, unlawful and a cynica l election ploy,s woul adding that those without loans should notd have to pay off everyone else s. what a concept. senator schmidt join ons us n
on the conservative end of the court that delivered a number of victorie s to the biden administration. right. including a huge victory where they uphel y wherd the immigration policies of the president. d tothey not hesitated to vote r the president when law and the constitution was on his side. it wasn t on his side here. was he was openly circumventing congress and using this attenuated it argumentthes involving this this act. and thee acy were rightfullyt you know, going to come downhese on the side of the constitution. but you now have the same group of court court of courpacf you know, we ve got to get ridt of the court or expandand ex the court. and these these types of attacks, these justice attacthee trying to get it right. and i think that they got a lot right this week. is week.yeah. and they also handed down a major free speech victory today and that that that case is going to resonate for decades. it s a huge victory for free. it will. this is it s very goodeech news
we will ground this new approach in a different law thany orig my original plan. the so called higherd education act. well, there you go. here with reaction. fox contributor jonathan turley. you know, jonathan, i you listen to him saying, oh, so many americans are disappointed he did that. he set them up to be disappointed and to feel like they were by promising something that was completely inappropriate and he knew it. with this new statement he made. and you ve got a great column out there and you ve been very, very direct about your opinionto about what he was doing here. where do you think this does go for now? oth and will he be successful iner some other fashion? desiell, this new path is designed to avoid thated constitutional power. right. what he s supposed to do do is t go to congress. he s supposed to go to congress and say everyone this, it s a great idea and get it passed. bus t he knows it won t pass because there is formidable oppositione to the
thought and heaven forbid you, should be shunned. you should be shut down, you should be in prison. the ideaprestigind the i that ie a pronoun improperly on purpose0 in the state of michigan, that you re going to get a $10,000 ae fine. i mean, who in the world thinks that that is the americra and way that that s that s consistent with the first amendment sham me on michigan? they are better than that. thcan t believe thaty they they continue to to support that that that regime there in michigan. well and that s what we they happened in europe. it s about the offended beingcrm able to determine if someone has committed a crime based on their feeling s. that is not a rule of law.so muc that s a madness of law. alth ml right everyone, thank you so much for being with me tonight. now, up nextd system , our two tiered system of justice is alive and well. we ll bring you thane on the hunter biden probe with matt whitaker, jon levine ,monica crowley, as this special edition of hannity con
alan dershowitz, and author of the new book trial the century,r fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett and economist steve moore. a bunch of smarty pants is, if i do say so myself. and professor dershowitz, let me start with you. i mean, this those the rhetoric that was being used, it s likepl they want a summer of riots, that they want the american peoplenot be - to not be not rey understand the role of the court or what constitutional law is and to be and to feel like personally violated when these were good decisions. this is what the court should be doing. what s your take on that? whatirony is that the three major decisions, the decision about religion?, racenoraut and executive authority are all traditional liberal decisions. liberals don t want race to be considered. justice, the most liberal person ever in the supreme court history, said no no,, cant