would be reversed, giving them another opportunity to blame republicanens. take a look. people think that the president of the uniteicans.d states, ther for debt forgiveness. s he does not. can he can postpone. he can p delayostpon. but he does not have that power. that would tha power t to bef congress. i m prepared to write off the $10,000 debt, but not 50. mr. president, let me ask you, because i don t think i have the authority to do it tigning a two year. yeah. and while the left spent the day complaining about the decisiont spening abou, mant celebrated the victory for millions of hardworking taxpayere victs, including missy senator eric schmidt, who launched thiers lawsuit whem he was attorney general of his state. schmidt wrote on twitter twittet biden s bailout was, quote, fundamentally unfair, unlawful and a cynica l election ploy,s woul adding that those without loans should notd have to pay off everyone else s. what a concept. senator schmidt join ons us n
to the senate is try to fight for this kind of structurahel reform to rein in and dismantle the administrative state. well, that s that s excellent. and that s exactly what we need. and the success of juse needt mu it. we ve seen that happen because of your work. thanse rk andk you, senator. i appreciate you joining me tonight. and congratulations. allations.l right. now, while the supreme court rejected biden s unconstitutional order today , the student loan battle is not over. during an address at the white houshouse following the decisio, biden outlined new actionso tr to try to ram through his bailout without congress. once again, watch this. let me begin by saying, i know there are millions ofy fl americans, of americans in this country who feel disappointe d and discouraged or even a little bit angry about the court es decision today a on student debt. and i must admit, i do, todm io need to find a new way to remove it as fast as we can. first, i m announcing today r a new pa
so there s it is very specific as to what typef of loans could be forgiven. thfwould not cover the scope o the current plan. well, second, he s got to go through rulemaking. wellaking., what it does do, th, it s going to take time, doesn t it? yes, well, exactly right. this allows them to keep up this rhetoric and to maintain the promises and then conts asnually point the republicans or to conservatives as as mean bigotsmean, while they know it s just theater as americans, it s theater is one thing politically, right. but when you re, you know, talking to the american people and depressing them and disappointing them and making them look at their neighbor funny, that s a wholk ate different ballgame, isn t it? well, it is sort of funny. you sell someone a fake gold watch and then you get them to be angry that it s not gold e involving some third party. i mean, he s the one that sold you the watc
we should that s that s what we should give our kids to take an that you are blessed.. you are lucky to be an american. and you should think that every singlea great .. that s a that s a great point, jason. a lot of people are lookinokingt the free speech decision as being or something or and then other decisions about racism. but there s this same thread and all of which is the basic constitutional norms,s and the things that all americans embrace, which is about, you knowth the, and eo our american civil rights movements about not beinsg for being different, for being able to express yourselfem differently. and that s what we fought for. and now we to be turning that around. and we ve become the thing that wa was so bad in the beginning by trying to shut down people. yeah, i haven t been ablepast to get past these these democrats and these these people on the fa r left who have preached for their whole lives about diversithavey and. and then you have a diversity of
we will ground this new approach in a different law thany orig my original plan. the so called higherd education act. well, there you go. here with reaction. fox contributor jonathan turley. you know, jonathan, i you listen to him saying, oh, so many americans are disappointed he did that. he set them up to be disappointed and to feel like they were by promising something that was completely inappropriate and he knew it. with this new statement he made. and you ve got a great column out there and you ve been very, very direct about your opinionto about what he was doing here. where do you think this does go for now? oth and will he be successful iner some other fashion? desiell, this new path is designed to avoid thated constitutional power. right. what he s supposed to do do is t go to congress. he s supposed to go to congress and say everyone this, it s a great idea and get it passed. bus t he knows it won t pass because there is formidable oppositione to the