the neck. at the time of that killing, bird had a documented historynth of gross negligence with aisce firearm. he left a loaded glock pistola i inloaded public men s room at the capitol, which for a law is a but f official firing offense. butor for some reason, michael the bird was still in the force that day. the woman he killed was calledld ashley babbitt. babbitt waashleys married 14 yea veteran of the u.s. militaryn ., she in a pool cleaning companyn. with her husband in san diego. physically, she was tiny. she was also unarmed.l by michael byrd later admitted here had no indication at all thated babbitt was carrying a weapon. visiblevi threat.le he killed her anyway.ay under normal circumstances, un would have been firedich he immediately and charged with murder, which he clearly committed. af but that s not what happened after doing essentially no investigattey e and into the shooting, nancy pelosi s congressional police force declaredlosi s c a national hery and the
and one of theone ofm is someth that we ve been talking about and certainly thinking about for quite some time, which som is the creation of a committee modeled after the famous frank church committee ofs th the nineteen seventies. that will look a lot more closelyat at the influence of the fbi and the various intel agencies on domestic politics. they re not allowe adren t to interfere in domestic politics. they clearlyalin domesc politic. and maybe congress could get toy the bottom of that fact. are the only ones who can. well, kevin mccarthy is goingatn to d.o that. his looks like he s going to be speaker. and his plan, we havave just learned, is to appoint reallyge one of the most honest and dogged members of congress will just say it, thomas massie of kentucky, to head thaentuckt committee, the new church r committee run by congressman thomasy massie, who , by the way, joins us now to announce it. congressman, thanks so much. for coming on .t look thanks, tucker. it looks like
doing there? why did she lie about being d there? we canid answer those questions, we should be able to , nor aut is anyone in authority want to talk about ray epp s. ramsey, of course, is the man who was caught on tape encouraging the crowd outside the capitol, both on january 5th and 6th to commit feloniestn by rushing inside. now, what s interesting is that the january 6th committee, under public pressure, did in e the end interview ray epps. havl now, we don t have all of the committee s records about that interview. we shoulat inter- wed, but we d. but some have been released and what they tell is amony remarkable story inwe h the testimony that we have, the committeave coaches repsy es on how to answer questions qut. his involvemen quote, i was in the front few with a few others.al i also orchestraso did it. i helped get people there, end quote. now, epp s admitted that in a text message to a relative on january 6th, he s admitting crimes he s never been even charged for his cr
up in his interview with the committee, someone on the committee respondsponds e way. and we re quoting, i just wantq it understand a little more your use of the word orchestrated. it sounds to me like at this point when you sent this text,ar you had turned away in parteein because of seeinsog some things that you didn t agree with .t? is that right? like when you sentke whe thin su are already on your way fromof the capitol because of concerns of people taking it init in a a different direction? oh, is that the most eve the leading question ever asked in the history of a congressional hearing? probably. and the whole intervie w goes on like this.keep in mi keep in mind, ramp snd, is onrf the only people caught on camera that day encouragingfh others to break the law. he s one of the only ones. ge and yet he s never been chargeda . and the january 6th committeenuw was on his side. why wahy wass the committee ands members working so hard to help ray epps now in his interview ha