Chief Justice Roberts well hear argument first this mni in case 221219, relentless versus the dept of commerce. Mr. Martinez. Oral argument of Roman Martinez on behalf of the petitioners martinez mr. Chief justice, and may it please tht for too long, chevron has distorted the dial process and undermined statutory interpretation. It should orruled for three reasons. First, chevron violates the constitution. Articliiempowers judges to say what the law is. It requires them to int federal statutes using their be a independent judgment. Chevron undermines that duty. It reall Interpretive Authority from courts to es, and it forces courts to adopt inferior Agency Construction are issued for political or policy reasons. In doing so, chevron blocks judges from serving as fl agents of congress. It mandates judicial bias and encourages agency overreach. And by removing key ec on executive power, it threatens individuerty. Chevron also violates the apa. The most straighrd reading of section 706 re
Trey good evening and thank you for joining us. Im trey gowdy and it isg as sunday night in america. Here we go again. Ld t a former President Trump versus current president joe biden. Will cleveland have company in Jothe History Books or will joe biden overcome historically low poll numbers . They are blinking Caution Lights for both candidates while theki American People settle in fongrs what looks like the longest General Election in history. That General Election started i earnest last night during the state of the union. Talk of unity for his inaugural address years ago is gone. This was talking about contrast, not reconciliation. My predecessor my formerican republican president tellso wh vladimir putin, do whatever the hell you want. He is the reason it was overturned. Myreason predecessor, many in ts chamber want to take Prescription Drug away by repealing the Affordable Care act. Im not going to let that happen. At h[applause]or and my predecessor if he is watching, instead of
Cooperateo proceed as if i wasnt here for the first argument so let me focus on whats dferent about texas. One thing thats different abxas is its definition of social media platforms excludes website. Wean put the gmail issue to one side when lkbout texas. It also excludes websitesor and. In the First Amendmentusess we call that contentbased discrimination. Thatsnef the reasons this statute is unconstitutional. The other thg thats different is that iso respects this statute operates more simply because it f clines from engaging iviewpoint discrimination. Were edo thinking that viewpointiscrimination is a bad thing and the government shouldnt do it. Do it it is a bad thing. When editors of speakers enga in viewpoint discrimination that is their first amendntight. It is also absolutely vital to the operation of these websites because if you have to be viewpot neutral that means suicideyou have materials that prevention you also haveo ve materials that advocate suicide promotion. Or if yo
This morning in22 976. In case garland v. Cargo. To fire aifle fitted with a bump stock, the shooter faces hitrigger finger on the builtin finger ledge and uses his other hand to press the rifle forward. As long as they maintain steady forward pressure, t rle will fire continuously until it runs out of bullets and will empty a 100 round magaze in about 10 seconds. Thoseeans do exactly what coress meant to prohibit when it enacted the prohibition on main guns, and those weapons are machine guns because they satisfy both parts of the definition. First, a rifle with a bump stock fire is more than one shot with single usage of the trigger. A function of the trigger happens when some a by the shooter starts a firing sequence. With a semi automatic rifle, it fires one shot for each action ofhe trigger because the shooter has to pull and release the trigger for every shot. A bump stock eliminatethe movementsfire many shots with oa forward push. Reondent says a separate function of the trigger
This runs about 2 1 2 hours. Cooperate to proceed as if i wasnt here for the first argume so let me focus on whats different about texas. One thing thats different abtexas is its definition of social med platforms excludes website. We can put the gmail issue to one side when talk about texas. It also cles websites primarily focused on news, sports and entertainment. In the fstmendment business we call that contentbased discrimination. Thats one of the reasons this statute i unconstitutional. Thother thing thats different is that in some respects this stut operates more simply because it forebids my clines from engaging in viewpoint discrimination. Were used to thinking that viewpoint discrimination is a bad thi a the government shouldnt dot. And of course when govnmts do it it is a bad thing. When editors ofpeers engage in viewpoint discrimination that is their First Amendment right. It is also absolutely vital to the operation of these websites because if you have to be viewpoint neut