and smoke cigars till. the other point. he thinks it s fascinating whenever there s a woman politician and he saltrizes it on veep, whenever there s a woman politician there s so much focus on what she s wearing and inevitably they also satirize the most idiotic role tim, of a vice president. what is the vice president s job exactly except to wait for the president to keel over? mean, it s a ridiculous job and she plays it ridiculously. when i was on commander in chief i killed that show really efficiently in two episodes. that my job. the minute i showed up it was over. you know, i mean you know what s in your head when you play that part for the husband of the secretary of state? you re home. she s coming home from being secretary of state, sort of dealing with the world, and you re at home dealing with the test papers from last night, you know. you ve got a different role in life. well, except that you have to remember that a guy who is an expert in the history of
committee questioned key members of the board that reviewed the obama administration s handling of the benghazi attack. one of the key questions, our next guest has. why wasn t secretary of state hillary clinton questioned in the first place? joining us now with thoughts on all of this, republican congressman trey gowdy. welcome. great to have you here today. thank you for joining us. yes, ma am. good to see you. uma: i know that you and others have been raising big concerns about why former secretary of state clinton wasn t interviewed by the accountability review board. have you come to any conclusions that point as to why she wasn t questioned about the attack on our consulate in benghazi? have i come to any conclusions as to why she was not interviewed? yeah. because there is no objectivity on the accountability review board. she picked people who will serve on it. and we re not usually very objective when it comes to judging ourselves. we don t grade our test papers in schoo
feelings either way. it turns out it s not anything. anything that involves kids. i need someone to strongly disagree with me. don t we over emphasize academics to this country instead of the other way around? well, i mean, it depends. that s a very loaded question. in terms of parents being involved, i think for school face-to-face is better versus the online thing. i think it s a new fan geled way of doing what was always done which was when i was a kid, hi to bring my test papers home and get them signed by my parents so they knew that my parents actually saw the grades and the idea was that my parents would have a discussion with me if anything had to be discussed and i was a straight a student. communication. and look at the field you went into. this is a great thing. why? because it s going to teach our kids unbelievable hacking skills. they used to have forgery. they all end up working for the nsa.
feelings either way. it turns out it s not anything. anything that involves kids. i need someone to strongly disagree with me. don t we over emphasize academics to this country instead of the other way around? well, i mean, it depends. that s a very loaded question. in terms of parents being involved, i think for school face-to-face is better versus the online thing. i think it s a new fan geled way of doing what was always done which was when i was a kid, hi to bring my test papers home and get them signed by my parents so they knew that my parents actually saw the grades and the idea was that my parents would have a discussion with me if anything had to be discussed and i was a straight a student. communication. and look at the field you went into. this is a great thing. why? because it s going to teach our kids unbelievable hacking skills. they used to have forgery. they all end up working for the nsa.