means it in a legal sense. he means a rhetorical sense. he is not just wrong he is dangerously wrong. by the way jim comey asks a rhetorical question what does it mean for the men and women of the fbi when you use the terms nar rhetoric. it has a unintended benefit to the people of the fbi. as frank knows the men and women of the fbi, i imagine they are bearing down really really hard on duties right now that they re ignoring the non-sense from the president of the united states and doubling and tripling efforts to protect us. they would be more likely to succeed if they were supported by the man in the white house. but i can tell you they are working hard to make sure we re okay. frank, i got another one for you. related topic, related character, from the washington post . rudolph gulini had a lengthy meeting last week with a former ukrainian diplomat as part of
it mean levying war with a designated enemy against the united states. julius and ethyl rosenberg who were convicted and put to death for giving away atomic energy secrets couldn t be charged with treason because at the time the soviets were not designated a enmanship of the united states. it has to do with helping people in wartime atack the u.s. this is hardly the first time we ve heard sowers terms tossed around in the public space. but this one, the way the president is using it is truly dangerous. truly dangerous and completely wrong as pete points out. this is not treason. it s not a case of treason. but i don t think the president means it in a legal sense. he means a rhetorical sense. he is not just wrong he is dangerously wrong. by the way jim comey asks a rhetorical question what does it mean for the men and women of the fbi when you use the terms