Wednesday, october 2. I am reading the script. October 2, 2019 at 6 00 p. M. Rules policy and legislation monday october 7 at 5 00 p. M. Curriculum and Program Wednesday october 23 at 6 00 p. M. Building and grounds monday october 28 at 6 00 p. M. Adhoc committee will be meeting thursday october 10 at 6 00 p. M. At a tentative location. Adhoc committee on Student Assignment was announced monday october 21st at 6 00 p. M. The joint committee from the School District and city college and board of supervisors friday october 11, 10 00 a. M. That meeting will be held in the legislative chamber at city hall. Quickly one last announcement. The credit club had a Panel Discussion with myself, commissioner sanchez and former educator from San Francisco that were all present during the third and marshall on october 11, 2002. There was a lot that we should revisit as a board and possibly with the city. I want to thank the latino club for pulling that together. We have a discussion coming up. It is
Thank you very much. Madam clerk, are there any other items before us today . There are no other items. Chairwoman we are adjourned. [meeting adjourned at 11 00 a. M. Pacific standard time] hi. My name is carmen chiu, San Franciscos elected assessor. In our seven mile by seven mile city, we have over 210,000 properties and close to 90 of their are residential like the homes you and i live in, so you might ask, how can we possibly value all these properties . Well, to better understand our work, we need to explain the states proposition 13 law. In 1978, california voters passed proposition 13. Under prop 13, we value your property at market value when you first buy it. Every year after, that value goes up by the c. P. I. Or the California Consumer price index. But if the c. P. I. Is more than 2 , prop 13 caps the increase at 2 . Well walkthrough the maximum increases prop 13 would allow. Lets take a home with initial value of 400,000. In the second year your assessed value grows by a ma
Appear on the october 1st board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise state. Chairman thank you. Can we call item number one. Item one is the ord nan and the administrative code to add a preference and City Affordable Housing projects for tenants temporarily evicted for rehabilitation work, to provide evidence of complying with the tenants right to reoccupy such tenant rental units. Chairman thank you so much. I forgot to announce we have our guest, supervisor peskin, who is here to talk about the substantial amendments for item one. Im going to pass this over to supervisor peskin. Thank you, supervisor walton. And i want to thank you for waiving the 30day rule. This is a proposal to amendment the Housing Preference policy to accommodate tenants displaced by temporary Capital Improvement conditions, which is quite pronounced in areas of the city that have older rent control housing like the corner of the city i represent. San franciscos existing rent law a allows landlords to evict te
Not a signed Lease Agreement. But it is something that you guys are working on it and it is doable and very intend to pursue it. I dont think we will have any time of any kind of Lease Agreement any time soon, but we do have the specs, which was a wish list for what they want. Within priced it out, we have a study, and the next section will be engagement with a catchment designer and going over the next level of detail. I dont know in terms of timing. We are planning on pursuing that next step. Again, i think that in between what you described, there is a spectrum of possibilities. They have been around and been doing this for a long time. They have done tenant improvements and build outs and other places. They do know both what is doable and what their funding is and what they can take on. Commissioner richards . I guess, i looked on the last couple pages of the revised motion. A talked about what was actually going to be given because of the state density bonus, but it does not quote
Guys are working on it and it is doable and very intend to pursue it. I dont think we will have any time of any kind of Lease Agreement any time soon, but we do have the specs, which was a wish list for what they want. Within priced it out, we have a study, and the next section will be engagement with a catchment designer and going over the next level of detail. I dont know in terms of timing. We are planning on pursuing that next step. Again, i think that in between what you described, there is a spectrum of possibilities. They have been around and been doing this for a long time. They have done tenant improvements and build outs and other places. They do know both what is doable and what their funding is and what they can take on. Commissioner richards . I guess, i looked on the last couple pages of the revised motion. A talked about what was actually going to be given because of the state density bonus, but it does not quote the hardship or the financials. I look look at office spac