About politics. Were talking about benghazi. The big Hillary Clinton hearing in congress, which has nothing to do with politics. This was about getting the truth and finding clear facts. I think just wait. Im waiting on the accurate statement. Im getting right now, the only one youve asked for is sidney blumenthal. You need to make sure the entire record is correct. And thats exactly what i want to do. Then go ahead. Im going to tell you laughter trevor so clear. So concise. It all makes sense now. And throughout the day, hillary was right in the thick of it. laughter ive been there, hillary. That feeling when baycalls a Benghazi Committee for the eighth time. But right now, im getting ahead ofinize mize. I should step back and explain. For those who dont know what this is about, today Hillary Clinton testified in congress for nearly 10 hours about benghazi. Thats like a whole season of television that the House Select Committee just dropped on us like they were netflix or something. l
Want to do. Then go ahead. Im going to tell you laughter trevor so clear. So concise. It all makes sense now. And throughout the day, hillary was right in the thick of it. laughter ive been there, hillary. That feeling when baycalls a Benghazi Committee for the eighth time. But right now, im getting ahead ofinize mize. I should step back and explain. For those who dont know what this is about, today Hillary Clinton testified in congress for nearly 10 hours about benghazi. Thats like a whole season of television that the House Select Committee just dropped on us like they were netflix or something. laughter and i watched all of it, because i dont just benghazi. I bingeghazi. laughter but in case you havent gotten into benghazi yet, let me catch you up on the night of september 11, 2012. Libyan extremists attacked an american compound and annex in benghazi, libya. The attack killed the u. S. Ambassador and three other americans so to find out what happened that night congress very reason
Trevor welcome to the daily show. Im trevor noah. My guest tonight, the moderator for the next republican president ial debate from cnbc, john harwood is joining us tonight, ladies and gentlemen cheers and applause but right now, were not talking about politics. Were talking about benghazi. The big Hillary Clinton hearing in congress, which has nothing to do with politics. This was about getting the truth and finding clear facts. I think just wait. Im waiting on the accurate statement. Im getting right now, the only one youve asked for is sidney blumenthal. You need to make sure the entire record is correct. And thats exactly what i want to do. Then go ahead. Im going to tell you laughter trevor so clear. So concise. It all makes sense now. And throughout the day, hillary was right in the thick of it. laughter ive been there, hillary. That feeling when baycalls a Benghazi Committee for the eighth time. But right now, im getting ahead ofinize mize. I should step back and explain. For th
Is not to put their self on the side or the other which is what , paul was saying was going on. Susan our guest said there is beginning to be a revisiting of lochner among libertarians. Our final clip is senator rand paul in 2013 on the senate floor talking about lochner. Sen. Paul the lochner case is an 1905. The majority rules 54 that the right to make a contract is part of your due process. Someone cannot deprive you of determining how long your working hours are without due process. So, president obama is a big opponent to this, but i would ask him among the other things i am asking him today to rethink the lochner case. The case in lochner is whether a majority rule, a state legislature, can take away your due process. Your due process to contract. Can it take away your life and liberty without due process . The court rules no. I think it is a wonderful decision. It expands the 14th amendment and says to the people that you have unenumerated rights. Susan as we close, we told folk
Rand paul is taking about talking about a certain view of the idea of being completely free at arms length doesnt hold in a lot of peoples minds. The era ofhold in progressive philosophy. You get the last word. In the last speech, he also cites my book and the argument bee is that this should presumed to be valid and if the government has a good reason, they have to present evidence of that reason in court. They were unable to do that according to five justices, that is what judging should require of legislatures. This is the fourth in a series of 12. Want tohave done if you learn more about these cases and if you are learning like we are if you are not a lawyer, we have ebook available for you that we are selling at cost. Mauro, anden by tony you can follow along with the next several cases of our series. Ofant to thank our guests understanding this case and gentlemen, thank you very much. Thanks, it was a pleasure. Cspans landmark cases series continues on monday evening. We will loo