Morning. San francisco 56 degrees this and san jose is at 58 degrees. This is just a little bit warmer than wla we were seeing at this time yesterday. We will warm up for most. Fairfield year getting to 92 degrees today. Oakland could reach about 75 degrees. San francisco will warm up a bit to 70 degrees and san jose 83. Napa also 83 degrees. So it will be a nice one all around for today. So if youre not a big fan of the hot temperatures, well it will cool down just a bit. Allie whats going on on the roads . Its not looking good. The only thing you see on your screen there eastbound 80 thats eastbound direction in the non commute direction thats a twrighthand shoulder. Its not backing things up. Just south of there through the 880. Theres a stalled vehicle and theyre waiting for a tow truck to come clear it out of of the way. 16 minutes from the carquinez bridge to the carquinez maze. Youre going to have an easy drive all the way through the bay bridge toll plaza. 4 32 lets go back to
Caused that explosion. From ktvu fox 2 news, this is mornings on 2. Good morning thank you for joining us if youre just waking up Tuesday Mornings im pam cook. And good morning happy tuesday im Frank Mallicoat in for steve. Thank you i appreciate that. Sara zendehnam is in for our weather today. Its going to be summerlike today. Things will cool off within the next couple of days. For today its going to be a nice warm day across the bay area, its going to be a nice one. Basically your summary of the day, 65 is the high to about 90. Really depending on are. You cant complain about too much sun. The warmth today is about 3 to 5 degrees warmer. So its not that significant of a difference but you will feel it in some of our inland locations about 90 degrees. Right now in santa rosa. Its a cool start to the day. 52 degrees. 55 degrees in oakland, liver more is at 60 degrees this morning and san jose is at 59 degrees. So we will warm up just a bit compared to yesterday. Our highs yesterday,
Reasons. Although they have directed their challenge to the statutory limit, they stipulated the first 200 50,000 of his loan was repaid with preElection Funds. The statute does not currently restrict the senators ability to obtain full repayment. The current regulatory barrier to repayment is selfinflicted. Appellees could have avoided injuries by behaving as they would have if the statute and regulations did not exist. They went out of their way to engage in transactions they would not otherwise have undertaken, solely to subject the senator to a financial loss and thereby lay the groundwork for a lawsuit. That self infliction of injury, for no purpose other than to facilitate , severed the causal link between the challenged laws and senator cruzs injury. On the merits, the loan repayment limit is constitutional. It imposes insubstantial burdens on the financing of electoral campaigns and targets a practice that has significant corruptive potential. A postelection contributor general
Reasons. Although they have directed their challenge to the statutory limit, they stipulated the first 200 50,000 of his loan was repaid with preElection Funds. The statute does not currently restrict the senators ability to obtain full repayment. The current regulatory barrier to repayment is selfinflicted. Appellees could have avoided injuries by behaving as they would have if the statute and regulations did not exist. They went out of their way to engage in transactions they would not otherwise have undertaken, solely to subject the senator to a financial loss and thereby lay the groundwork for a lawsuit. That self infliction of injury, for no purpose other than to facilitate , severed the causal link between the challenged laws and senator cruzs injury. On the merits, the loan repayment limit is constitutional. It imposes insubstantial burdens on the financing of electoral campaigns and targets a practice that has significant corruptive potential. A postelection contributor general
Reasons. Although they have directed their challenge to the statutory limit, they stipulated the first 200 50,000 of his loan was repaid with preElection Funds. The statute does not currently restrict the senators ability to obtain full repayment. The current regulatory barrier to repayment is selfinflicted. Appellees could have avoided injuries by behaving as they would have if the statute and regulations did not exist. They went out of their way to engage in transactions they would not otherwise have undertaken, solely to subject the senator to a financial loss and thereby lay the groundwork for a lawsuit. That self infliction of injury, for no purpose other than to facilitate , severed the causal link between the challenged laws and senator cruzs injury. On the merits, the loan repayment limit is constitutional. It imposes insubstantial burdens on the financing of electoral campaigns and targets a practice that has significant corruptive potential. A postelection contributor general