Responsible for 45 emissions. Europe, 15 . Altogether, 60 emissions. It is a political commitment at the highest level. This would show the responsible leadership level 228 European Countries plus United States plus china. This is in terms of numbers. Paquette, this, i believe, china being a part of the game. This will inject a very Strong Political laments and to be part of this process. It can be more and more difficult for the countries who are other significant emitters who will not be a part of the coalition of finding a solution. It will be very difficult for them not to be part of the countries who want to find the solution. And these countries are the 28 European Countries, europe and china. Number three, i believe the key issue here is china. In europe and i believe in north america and asia, many people who find a solution to Climate Change say and will say we can do a lot of things to reduce emissions. But if china doesnt move, we cannot find a solution. So why should we pun
[laughter] thank you and i will be quick. I want to add a sense of urgency here. The ukrainian economy is down. [inaudible] than that we need to do on our side is assess prices in the top 10 of gdp and it is an interesting system. What the west needs to do is to spend this on top of the 7 billion and it makes this for five or six years. We will deliver the extra copies to your institute. [laughter] asking the panelists to wrap up, whatever theyd like to say, steve, we will start with you about a 30 billiondollar western assistance package to what your point is. We have written two pieces in the last two weeks which lay out the western response and want the ukrainians have responsibility for and i commend them. They are available on the Peterson Institute website and i agree with every word that he has written. And i do want to answer the point about military assistance. First of all with a caviar and the less it is talked about the better. But here we are. Second, there are the house a
Your students are graduating with stem rich jobs and arts and political opportunity, what do we want for our graduates. The reasons we did this and Many School Districts across the country have redefined success. The death of no child left behind, we have received waivers of much more balanced for the whole child. Not just measuring the students success as standardized testing, but what does that mean and what are the measures. There we had students, teachers, panels, principals and started to say what is it we want for our students to be able to thrive. And how do we rally a diverse Stakeholder Community to implement this vision. One of the trends and this is sort of some of what we talked about the trends that informed us theres lots of these and well have the sole vision document next week and it will be online and well sends you copies, but right now our district is more et anically diverse than the rest of the citys projected to be in 2025. What were saying is if we want to interr
Zinga has worked with us to create game academies and were rethinking the career tech approach to more of a link learning approach. Those are areas where we have fundsers interested in and well be doing Proactive Fund raising versus waiting for people to come to us. Really getting the message out that this is not about funding, but about addressing Public Education and moving to this 21st century vision. I think when tony smith was within the School District before he went to oakland he used the terminology that hes trying to disrupt patterns of sexism. Im curious if you brought up girls and low income groups and the digital divide, im wondering what part of the division to action is addressing what smith would remind us of in terms of achieving access, equity and social justice. This is why itd be great to hear the voice of the stuntds. When you talk to our students theres a couple things. First of all theyre board with the traditional ways of teaching and i think thats true for a lot
To some of the private schools and the kind of things have access to and our stunlts are fall and kind of leapfrog. I mean, in some ways we have to stop doing the old things weve been doing and push ourselves to innovate more. We dont have ten years to do this. We have the next two to three years to retool oufrss and give our students and teachers the tools they need to innovate, which they dont have right now. Thank you for the great question. That gets to the last point. We need to raise the financial social and Political Capital to do this work. Its a real call to action to change conditions for our students because right now 3500 to 4,000 students graduate from our high schools every year and we want all of them to have the choice to do post secondary experiences that lead them right into jobs in San Francisco that are high wage, high demand, if thats what they choose so they can live, leads and work and thrive in San Francisco and retain the character of our city. Thats why were v