The anticancer cells. But because he is speaking into the microphone, all the way to the back of the room to the press riser, the malt boxes plugged in to buy all the networks and the people watching the reporting of the iowa caucus results in new york and washington candidate and washington candidate up here 3500 people. They hear one person and one microphone who is sounding unhinged. This season secretary clinton has been taken to task for shouting and screaming that her cries. Is that the same phenomenon, although last night i was struck that she did not sound. Weve seen a development because both heard the Technical Support is Getting Better because she would get in front of these crowds and she would try and match the energy of the crowd and maybe she didnt have the size of the monitor she needed to pull backs down and tell the speaker its okay. You dont need to project as much as you were. Trump, if he says im playing the womens card, and deal me in. Really trained it to the bac
Watched the announcement of the announcement of the book awards live on cspan2 on november 16. Member of these authors have appeared or will be appearing on book tv. You can watch them on our website, booktv. Org. Next up, former white house president ial events director josh king talks about his book, off script and advanced mans guide to white house stagecraft, Campaign Spectacle and political suicide. Mitchell switch, andrew frank and steve are, swaggering advancement who loom the craft on watcher mondales campaign served as my role models. They were the democratics answer to michael during the summer of 1988 and they taught me well. Schwartz was a lead advancement brimming with selfconfidence, and quick humor. [applause]. Was that selfserving and not by the way, i had to read that. Whos out here claimed that he was his mentor but in the book he got four pages that was known as a great teacher. So just to be clear on that. Josh is a good buddy and a good friend and a lot of people w
So. I think youll find a lot of support among the committee for clearer cyanide, but also to resources needed to address these issues and not without a lot of conversations this morning about prevention and the importance of educating students about healthy relationship, healthy encounters and im glad we are talking about this before they get to college. There were some conversations about the teach safe relationship fact that safe relationship fact that theres a version and have been a cosponsor of other members of the committee. I invite the other Committee Members and colleagues to look at that enjoy nonbecause if we are preventing that is the best approach. We know we can take stronger steps not only in prevention. We want to make sure survivors of Sexual Assault have access to Research Services and privacy on an offcampus is and i want to emphasize we need to have policies encourage, not discourage survivors from reporting and tickling counseling. That is something we see in more
Implement encryption where the products make sense to include encryption. Yeah. Agent littlehale, as you know, when the Police Search a home or business, officers will provide a copy of a warrant authorizing the search. This might reveal the basic type of investigations whether it involves terrorism or drugs or medicare fraud, but the police dont have to say anything more. Im told Law Enforcement has serious concerns about a provision in the lee leahy bill that changes the notice provisions to require Law Enforcement to go beyond that, potentially divulging specific investigative detail to a target. Do you share these concerns about in this bills notice provisions . Why or why not. We do, mr. Chairman. Because we are both concerned that providing greater protection for evidence because its in digital form is in fact not bringing digital evidence in line with evidence in the physical world. And also because when a search warrant is executed in the physical world, we control the access t
Things like that potentially unininvestigatable if the target has done a good enough job of hiding his other traces. If we believe that be the case, we wouldnt take the position we have. Our belief is the civil agencies with the tools they have can veth. It is our belief that the type you have to be arguing in order for that to be the case, you have to argue theres no case in which access to information by direct request to the Service Provider contributed in a material way to an investigation . I think its difficult to be categorical in a hypothetical situation. So i would not want to say that. But i will say i think we think on balance, balancing the law the needs of Law Enforcement with the privacy here we believe that the best the best outcome to this is that the civil agencies work with the tools they have rather than extending this new power to them. But you agree and accept that a contested Court Proceeding in open court with the target of the investigation present is a more rig