And to emergency and cellular lines but not to residential lines. Under wellestablished rules of statutory construction the entire phrase to be called sequential Number Generator that has a statue of impossible between the definition and the targeted mission under ordinary rules of grammar that modifier not just a second and so those of the disparate impact reinforces that conclusion first it is set off by that, modified by the verb and second a direct object the direct object of those telephone numbers to be called in those were significant judicial that. And then to the Residential Land line. From those in 1991. And with those multiple business lines that were in with those and if they were really aiming at those calls from devices the failure to protect the hope would be inexplicable. Mr. Clement your friend on the other side says we should look at the passage and not to the rules of syntax. I know you were dispute about the passage but as a general matter he is right . The drafters
And to emergency and cellular lines but not to residential lines. Under wellestablished rules of statutory construction the entire phrase to be called sequential Number Generator that has a statue of impossible between the definition and the targeted mission under ordinary rules of grammar that modifier not just a second and so those of the disparate impact reinforces that conclusion first it is set off by that, modified by the verb and second a direct object the direct object of those telephone numbers to be called in those were significant judicial that. And then to the Residential Land line. From those in 1991. And with those multiple business lines that were in with those and if they were really aiming at those calls from devices the failure to protect the hope would be inexplicable. Mr. Clement your friend on the other side says we should look at the passage and not to the rules of syntax. I know you were dispute about the passage but as a general matter he is right . The drafters
The equal protection clause. But asking this court to invalidate more than 6. 8 million votes, thereby disenfranchising every single voter in the commonwealth. Can you tell me how this result can possibly be justified . Your honor, we are not asking you to invalidate 6. 8 million votes. We are asking [indiscernible] approximately 680,000. [indiscernible] it is somewhat unfair for the isson, but if there something wrong with the ballots, [indiscernible] case, itis particular was a claim, two different and it was that uniformly republicans had no opportunity to observe. And on that basis, the conduct was egregious, premeditated, the conduct was planned. It couldnt have just been done on the spur of the moment. The purpose was to have those ballots examined in secret so that only the democratic officeholder would get to see it. This was in two counties at no place else in the state. I heard a representative of chester county, i believe, say that that didnt happen in their county. If that
In this portion, the judge questions the Trump Campaign legal team. Portion, the judge questions the Trump Campaign legal team. Judge brann i have some questions. I am going to start with you. You are welcome if you think it is best before answering this to either mr. Giuliani or another, but i am going to ask you because you have been involved in this case from the beginning. You are alleging that the individual plaintiffs, mr. Hendrix and mr. Lawrence, were denied the right to vote under the equal protection clause. But asking this court to invalidate more than 6. 8 million votes, thereby disenfranchising every single voter in the commonwealth. Can you tell me how this result can possibly be justified . Your honor, we are not asking you to invalidate 6. 8 million votes. We are asking [indiscernible] approximately 680,000. [indiscernible] it is somewhat unfair for the isson, but if there something wrong with the ballots, [indiscernible] case, itis particular was a claim, two different
, it is the courts preference that the attorney or attorneys for one of the defendants present the general defense and then if it is necessary, the remaining defendants may raise any factual or legal issues that are specific as to that particular defendant, do we agree that that would be the best way to proceed . Good afternoon, i would like to take the lead. If any other lawyers have any other we would do a little round robin if everyone is going to be acknowledged. I dont think i need an Opening Statement but i will give you the opportunity to make one, i have Read Everything that has been docketed, there are a couple minuscule issues i want to take up. You can reasonably anticipate with his desk what those issues will be. Let me just make sure before i to Opening Statements clarify a few items, make sure we are all on the same page, i think we all are. The plaintiff amended a complaint which was filed this has essentially removed several counts from the original complaint. As i unde