Banks cut back. The royal bank of scotland will be stashing staff numbers and in japan. Hello. Welcome to countdown. We will beming up, live in paris. Conferenceal tech which brings together leading companies, innovators and startups. We have exclusive interviews through the morning starting with le webs founder. Markets are in focus after us a lot and equities yesterday. Policymakers on short loans. Of parliamentary elections and the Russian Central Bank also meet in the next 24 hours. I will start with greece. What a day. The biggest oneday decline since 1987. That tells you something. Something very interesting happened in the bond market. I will focus on this later. The yield on the threeyear bond went to the yield of a 10 year bond. It is an inverting yield curve. That is a worry because that means greece will not have access to Capital Markets and will face difficulties raising money in the future. The asset markets in greece are flashing red right now. It all came on the same da
Well, in the months that followed these questioned appointments, the white house and the Senate Democrats that control the senate came to a deal where they made it much harder for republicans to fully buster. And so to some extent, the issue has been sidestepped. But this certainly does limit the future ability of president s to unilaterally declare the senate in recess and make recess appointments. It will to some limited degree constrain the power of the president. Mike doyle of mcclatchy, we appreciate your input. A reminder to cspan viewers that all of the cases weve covered over the past number of years are available at cspan. Org. So that wraps up this Supreme Court oral argument. If you missed it, well air it again later today at 6 25 p. M. Eastern. We continue our series tomorrow with mccheckmccutcheon verse se. Thursday well focus on warrantless mobile phone searches, and well finish friday with the sebelius v. Hobby lobby case which deals with contraceptives coverage. Heres w
San francisco . And this public and this problem involved. There arent fatalities involved in this but its devastating just as the fires on 22nd and mission and on mission and 22nd and third and 24th street and all of the other fires happening over the last 10 years on valencia street so how are we going to get the puc to raise their hand and yes we will participate with you and address the issue without displacement . Thats what people are asking for. Thank you. Thank you very much sir. [applause] is there any other member of the public who has not spoken who would like to speak on this item . If so please come on up. I think that concludes it. Public comment is maam, are you speaking . Public comment is closed. Thank you. Mr. Chair if i may follow up with mr. Cruz and first of all with respect to 17th and kyu gu. Gua we will inform the supervisor that people are here and give mr. Cruz an opportunity to respond to that and it looks like something along the lines of this hearing that w
Gentleman said low points that maybe the best thing for the city from an overall cost perspective. I will leave that to the policy makers. Well generate the data and information and work with the community. We do sympathize. I was out there in december and walking through 2 feet of water in some of the residences so i know what they went through, and so i am sorry that were here but were are working on it. Before we go on to 17th and folsom can you Say Something to the other residents . Yes, just as stephanie is leading 17th and folsom another staff member saeed is working on that situation. Theyre complicated by the freeway work there. The woman that spoke her property is at ground zero and experienced the greatest flooding. Technically it should be easier to address than 17th and folsom and have a white paper within the two weeks of the completion of 17th and folsom and somebody referenced the sewer system failure. I take issue to that. It performed to design. The storms are beyond w
Thank you. [applause] next speaker. Hi. My name is malcolm davis. I own the building that houses stable cafe at 17th and folsom and i wanted to show a diagram here. So theres a proposal to build a park that they have talked about putting retention feemps underneath and what i understand why cant they lower the entire parking lot and make it a very simple even if only needed to be for the 15 years its going to take to do the big project if they could make a big depressed area there thats not covered. Of course it costs a lot of money to cover it. Couldnt we pick a bunch of parking lots and lower the level . I have driven down to the buildings during rainstorms at three in the morning and the parking lot is safe and dry and my building is under water. I am wondering about the calculations of the cost of these things and incredibly high cost for something it becomes undoable and im an architect. I am used to solving problems in a way thats going to happen. It doesnt do any good to dream a