Well, in the months that followed these questioned appointments, the white house and the Senate Democrats that control the senate came to a deal where they made it much harder for republicans to fully buster. And so to some extent, the issue has been sidestepped. But this certainly does limit the future ability of president s to unilaterally declare the senate in recess and make recess appointments. It will to some limited degree constrain the power of the president. Mike doyle of mcclatchy, we appreciate your input. A reminder to cspan viewers that all of the cases weve covered over the past number of years are available at cspan. Org. So that wraps up this Supreme Court oral argument. If you missed it, well air it again later today at 6 25 p. M. Eastern. We continue our series tomorrow with mccheckmccutcheon verse se. Thursday well focus on warrantless mobile phone searches, and well finish friday with the sebelius v. Hobby lobby case which deals with contraceptives coverage. Heres w
Republicans, 202 5853881. Democrats, 202 5853880. Ndependents, 202 5853882 Law Enforcement, 202 5853883. Au can send us say tweet tweet or find us on facebook or an email. President obama was asked about the militarization of the police force. [video clip] about of the great things the United States has been our ability to maintain a distinction between our military. Nd domestic Law Enforcement that helps preserve civil liberties. It helps ensure the military is accountable to civilian direction. That has to be preserved. , i think1 understandably a lot of folks saw communities that were illequipped for potential terrorist attacks. That they should have proper equipment to deal things that could arise in local communities. Some Law Enforcement did not that they can operate in the midst of a disaster. Some communities needed to be prepared if there was a chemical attack and they did not have hazmat suits. Having said that, i think it is probably useful for us to review , howhe funding h