Petitioner, versus arizona. We are argument, number 18, row versus wade. Quite often, in our most famous decisions are once that the court took unpopular. Lets go through a few cases that illustrate very dramatically and visually what it means to live in a society of 310 million different people who help stick together because they believe in the rule of law. Good evening and welcome to cspan and the National Constitution centers landmark cases series. Tonight, case number 11 out of 12. And this is the 1966 case miranda v. Arizona that helped revolutionize producing during the night. Its your under arrest, you have the right to remain silent, anything you say can be used against you do you know your miranda . Writes yes. Lets hear them. You have a lot of stuff to do. Are you sure you understand your rights . Oh, yes. He explained them to me. Just like they do on television. Ive done nothing wrong. If the right to remain silent. I bought them. Talk to my lawyer. You have the right to an
Is a rare move. Can you give perspective, how rare are we talking . Reporter to give you some perspective, fbi directors are appointed for 10 year terms. Comey only served three of those years. The last time Something Like this happened was in 1993 under president clinton who then fired the fbi chief over ethics concerns. Kenneth craig, thank you. Reaction is boring and as you can imagine from california and bay area lawmakers. Allen martin follows that part of our story. Reporter senator Dianne Feinstein says President Trump called her to indicate that he would be removing director comey, saying the fbi needed a change. Now, as the Ranking Member of the judiciary committee, she wrote the next fbi director must be strong and independent and will receive a fair hearing in the judiciary committee. Senator, harris wrote on twitter i said it before and i will say it again, we must have a special prosecutor to oversee the fbis russia investigation. This cannot wait. An east bay congressman
Senator jackson and the aclu forced him to change direction. When we proposed the 18minimum, we knew that there were certain circumstances. We just hadnt heard them yet. Reporter the aclu argued that not all underage marriages are coercive and theres not enough data to make a decision about the issue. So they passed a new version that required a Court Counselor to individually interview anyone under 18 who wants to get married. And it requires all courts to track and publish data on the courts petition and ages of the people making the request. He says hes laying the ground work for more restrictions. The purpose of the Data Collection is to be able to look in 2019 to see where we are. Reporter he says once theres more information, another law can be proposed. In the meantime, sarah says this is a good start and she wishes she had had an individual interview when she was 15. I watch people my age having careers, building their lives, and i feel about ten steps behind them. Reporter now
Before the Honorable Supreme Court before the United States are admonished to give their attention. Landmark cases, cspans special history series produced in cooperation with the National Constitution center, exploring the human stories and constitutional dram as behind 12 historic Supreme Court decisions. Number 759, earnest miranda petitioner, versus arizona. We hear arguments of roe against wade. Quite often the most famous decisions are ones the court took that were quite unpopular. Lets go through a few cases that illustrate very dramatically and visually what it means to live in a society of 310 million different people who helped stick together because they believed in a rule of law. Good evening and welcome to cspan and the National Constitution centers landmark cases series. Tonight case number 11 out of 12 and this is a 1966 case, miranda versus arizona that helped to revolutionize policing in america. Youre under arrest. You have the right to an attorney. You have the right
Before the Honorable Supreme Court before the United States are admonished to give their attention. Landmark cases, cspans special history series produced in cooperation with the National Constitution center, exploring the human stories and constitutional dram as behind 12 historic Supreme Court decisions. Number 759, earnest miranda petitioner, versus arizona. We hear arguments of roe against wade. Quite often the most famous decisions are ones the court took that were quite unpopular. Lets go through a few cases that illustrate very dramatically and visually what it means to live in a society of 310 million different people who helped stick together because they believed in a rule of law. Good evening and welcome to cspan and the National Constitution centers landmark cases series. Tonight case number 11 out of 12 and this is a 1966 case, miranda versus arizona that helped to revolutionize policing in america. Youre under arrest. You have the right to an attorney. You have the right