here he is unsparing in his rejection of trump and giuliani s election fraud delusions. i told them that the stuff that his people were shoveling out to the public was bull [ bleep ]. that the claims of fraud were bull [ bleep ], and you know, made a statement about that, but i reiterated that they wasted a whole month on these claims on the dominion voting machines and they were idiotic claims. i specifically raised a dominion voting machines which i found to be among the most disturbing allegations and disturbing in the sense that i saw absolutely zero basis for the allegations, but they were made in such a sensational way that they obviously were influencing a lot of people, members of the public, that there was this systemic corruption in the system and that their votes didn t count and that these machines controlled by somebody else were actually determining it which was complete nonsense, and it was being laid out there, and i told him that it was that it was stuff
30 minutes after the last fund-raising email was sent, the capitol was breached. we re back with our panel. pete strzok, is that legal? i think, nicole, it s a great question. we re talking a quarter of a billion dollars here. $250 million doesn t sound as large in my mind as the billion figure. but i think it draws a whole host of questions about election campaign raising laws and what is and isn t allowed in terms of representation of how those funds are going to be used. i think it s certainly going to cast a spotlight on mark meadows s charitable organization. well, what is that charitable organization? what does it purport to do? how s it spending its money and to the extent it as a charitable organization enjoys any nonprofit tax stus, i think it s reasonable to look at that and figure out what s going on and of course yet again the trump properties are being used as a source of emoluments, whether it s from trump supporters or foreign governments like he used