corruption part of her big theme. whether or not joe biden did the right thing in ukraine, there s no question that hon tear biden s hunter biden s behavior was swampy behavior. he was slip streaming behind his father to do business deals. there s no question of what he was doing. that s what warren is campaigning against. she doesn t need to make that case at this point. she is rising in the polls. she s up about 10 points with moderates and she s up about 10 points with black voters. neither of which are her natural constituencies. i think she feels like she can leave that to the other candidates. this is going to be the biggest presidential debate stage in history, i believe. there are four guys who are not qualified yet for the november debate. they re looking for a way to break through and elizabeth warren can let them take those shots. paul: does anybody take a shot at warren? i doubt it. paul: just a free ride? she s now equal they all have target voters
a data firm, cambridge an lit ka. data up to 80,000 users to be precise, collected before the election that research went on to help the trump campaign better target voters online. personality quizes, we have all seen them on facebook. they got them through a personality quiz app taken by 300,000 users. . took data like your music preferences, gender, demographic, marital statics, likes. that gave the researcher access to our data and our friends data. this methodology was completely permissible at the time until facebook restricted access in 2015 with privacy settings that allowed developers more access to our information. these are ethical debates
harvested data from facebook users. reporter: it was collected before the election. that one research firm went on to help the trump campaign better target voters online. personality quizzes, we ve all seen them on facebook. reporter: the way they got the data was simple, through a personality quiz app taken by 100,000 facebook years. we were able to form a model to predict the personality of every adult in the united states of america. reporter: music preference, gender, demographics, marital status, likes. reporter: what few knew was giving the researcher access to not only our data but our friends data. this methodology was completely permissible at the time until facebook restricted access at 2015 and developers had more access to our information. these are ethical debates that will impact 2 billion people about the spread of data and
with this administration. that s for sure. let s turn now to the upcoming midterm elections. a lot of eyes on that just a few months away. reporting that democrats are finally getting serious about the mid terms and the data they re seeing. they went to a dnc data boot camp where they re educating campaigns about how you help target voters. the new thing, the big thing, and 2020 campaigns, are going to focus on reaching individual voters. like targeting us, not just demographics, but particular people. another fascinating midterm story out there today, on the front page of usa today. campaign ads that crush we talked about here on msnbc, they
into target voters. i think what facebook is trying to do and mark zuckerberg is going to try to do is get out in front of this to some degree. he s allegedly going to say he is at embracing the honest ads acts which changes disclosure for online ads. harris: i want to jump in here with this idea that you were touching on and that is of the promise of privacy. i think jenna relishing the canal, people know you are going to get much privacy if you re online. if you want privacy, stay in your house, locked the door, close the windows, and don t call or text anybody but that s ridiculous. we know we re going to go online and have some exposure. so with facebook and others are going to be challenged but it is not just this company. where did they get to the point where they say your privacy is worth something, maybe some way that we can do some business together where you level up where you re giving us something that s valuable and you get something in return. i don t know what that wil