slowly and rightfully come to the prince charles philippe arthur george. we, therefore, the lords spiritual and temporal of this ram, members of the house of commons together with other members of the late majesties pretty council, the representatives of the realms of territories, the citizens of london and others, we hereby, with one voice s, with the consent of tongue and heart, publish and pro claim that prince charles phillip arthur george is now, by the death of our late sovereign of happy memory, become our only lawful and rightful leach l orange. charles the third. by the grace of god, the united kingdom, a northern island, all the other realms and territories, he is king, head of the commonwealth defender of the faith. to whom we do acknowledge all of our face and obedience with humble affection. beseeching god, by whom kings and queens to rein, to bless his majesty with long and happy years to rain over us. given this at st. james s palace, it is the tenth day of our
moment. it came very late in the queen s life, in the last year. the queen issued a statement saying that the queen believed that camilla should be the queen consort. that was her majesty putting her stamp on what the succession should look like. she did not want to leave it to public opinion, newspaper editorials, talking heads on television. she wanted it clear that this was her wish. it was her dying wish. camilla should be accepted and fully integrated into the royal family. she should become known as queen just as her mother was the queen mother all those years ago. let s put a pause on this conversation for a moment. we can reset for everybody out
commenting. it will be one of the first tests on what the new trump is, now he s going to be more presidential since he s preside president-elect? how many times have we seen the president is coming? i m with you on that. this was one of the biggest media failures of our generation, to not see this coming, to have under estimated the trump wave. it was one of the biggest failures, all the talking heads on television have a lot more soul searching. just speaking for myself i ve just begun that process. john king says that trump wave is a myth because less people voted this time than they did last time. yes, and also i get frustrated reading about trump s america or clinton s america. it s divided america. that s the more honest rendering situation. what we missed is the rural roar, what wascoast, journalist
they can come home, face the music, be charged with adid and- adidding and abetting materially, or they can go to a country without an extr extradin treaty and live out their lives. we need a tool like this. having said that, two things. one is it s unclear how well this was briefed to the senate and house intelligence committees. congress has a right to know about these things and be briefed about them. second of all, you re right. it s interesting. i remember how attorney general alberto gonzalez, three heads of the office of legal counsel, i remember how the general counsel at dod and the vice-president s office were excoriated by liberal politicians, leftist commentators, talking heads on television. these men were hounded, they and others were hounded, demands that they be charged with war crimes, that their law licenses be taken away. anybody who did that kind of
supreme court? well, in fairness to her, i think she s speaking as a politician, not as a lawyer or legal scholar. i remember we interrogated congressman jim clyburn, the number three ranking democrat, where in the constitution is the federal government authorized to manage health care. he looked at me, and he goes, judge, most of what we do down here is not authorized by the constitution. they are simply concerned with staying in power and with bringing home the bacon. they are not concerned with whether or not what they do is authorized by the supreme law of the land. i think that mrs. pelosi will be unhappily surprised when we learn finally how the supreme court comes down on this in june. but for her to suggest that there isn t even a constitutional argument to be made reveals an embarrassing indifference or ignorance on her part. jon jp there have been an awful lot of suggestions primarily from the left, talking heads on television and so forth, that if this court strike down th