let s not gloss it over nbc and cbs too. when you have someone in your midst and creates unsafe working environment whether it s discrimination or hostile or sexual or whatever it is, you have to have a chorus of voices. what i hear from cnn right now is silence. it doesn t just have to be the women speaking up. i m wondering where those people, those woke folk over there and that liberal bastion are defending the women who were gone after by one of the employees there. now, last hour, joe concha and i said could it have been a contract why they won t touch him? what in your contract says that it s okay to do immoral things? in fact, you have a morality clause in most talent contracts. i don t want to speak out of school. i don t know what s in chris cuomo, maybe they gave him an exemption because they didn t think he would be moral, i don t know. buff the fact of the matter is, he was still on the air last night. there s no mention that he won t
$25 million a year. 21st century fox released this statement. his new contract, which was made at a time typical for renewals of multiyear talent contracts, added protections for the company, specifically aimed at harassment. including that mr. o reilly could be dismissed if the company was made aware of other allegations or if additional relevant information was obtained in a company investigation. the company subsequently acted based on the terms of this contract. this is one of the biggest shows in television. earned the network a reported $326 million a year. some people are look at this with skepticism, saying this contract was not about protecting women. it was about protecting fox and about keeping its biggest star in place. absolutely. what are you hearing? and, look, rock eroger ailes twice as much money to leave fox news than gretchen carlson did
relied on unsubstantiated allegations and anonymous sources and incomplete or stolen documents. the parent company of fox issued this statement, thinks new contract made at the time typical for renewals of multiyear talent contracts added protections for the company, specifically aim at has asments, including he could be dismissed if the company was made aware of other allegations or if additional relevant information was obtained in a company investigation. the company subsequently acted based on the terms of this contract. this morning on the today show, megyn kelly raised concerns about her former colleague s behavior to the presidents of fox. o reilly s suggestion that no one complained about his behavior is false. i know because i complained. i did something that day i ve never done before, i wrote an e-mail to the co-presidents of fox news, big shine and jack
state she was sexually harassed or intimidated by bill o reilly when she worked there during that 15-year tenure. 21st century fox issued this statement. his new contract which was made at a time typical for renewals of multiyear talent contracts added protections for the company specifically aimed at harassment, including that mr. o reilly could be dismissed if the company was made aware of other allegations or if additional relevant information was obtained in a company investigation. the company acted based on the terms of this contract. the way this statement reads is that 21st century fox clearly on the side of women and against sexual harassment, wrote a contract that protected these women as opposed to protecting fox. is that how you read it when you read it as a lawyer? i read it that they gave an exit clause to protect themselves. they being 21st century fox.