federal court. swing back to the mar-a-lago case. obviously we saw the de oliveira arraignment yesterday. the surveillance video now in the hands of the prosecution of trump s defense lawyers. what s your sense of what that footage actually contains? could that be damning to the former president and his codefendants? it could be. but we have to see exactly what is revealed at the trial if these particular charges do end up going to trial as they re charged now. so carlos de oliveira and walt nauta the other codefendant are accused along with donald trump of trying to talk about and get rid of surveillance footage. not that any surveillance footage that the trump organization had of that property was actually deleted, but they re charged with wanting to try and take steps to get rid of it because it very well may have captured them moving boxes that had federal records in them when the justice department was seeking to get those returned. and that surveillance footage, that s only o
election. it s tuesday. so the grand jury in that case may be meeting just a few hours from now as we learn new information in the other federal investigation into the ex-president. the classified documents case, his mar-a-lago property manager out on $100,000 bond after appearing in a miami courtroom. carlos de oliveira telling the i.t. director, quote, the boss wanted surveillance video deleted. it s now in the hands of the lawyers for both the defense and prosecution, according to a new court filing. legal action means legal bills. new this morning, what we re seeing just how big those bills are. how much is this costing the former president? well his political action committee save america is burning through cash and now has less than $4 million left in its account. that is down from $105 million at the beginning of last year. it does not seem to be hurting trump politically in the polls. a new poll shows trump statistically tied with president biden in a hypothetical matchup in
response to musk s attorney who says you re right to say that about 99% of their blue accounts, that your group prying no information about testing of tweets? we have been transparent. we have it on the website where we detail exactly what we did. that s why they re able to criticize the methodology. we stand by it, of course. but that s just one claim he s made. in fact, he s kind of dropped that claim in the last week. and what he s now saying is that another study that we did that quantified, that put some numbers around the increase in hate, in hate speech on that platform, when mr. musk took over, he is saying that s the problem now. the truth is that he s been casting around for a reason to blame us for his own failings as a ceo. because we all know that when he took over, he put up the bat signal to racists, to anti-semites saying that twitter
dod which was to create a dialogue between people of different backgrounds. t it wasn t about to blame, that s one of the things that s missing when we have these discussions. people think that because you want to have a dialogue about race and history matters, i think we need to think about it thatat way. tucker: that s false. what our kids are being taught and what starbucks is teaching us is that certain groups are more racist than others and that s a lie as you know because all people are fundamentally the same and capable of great good and great bad. no group has a monopoly on racism in this or any other country. here s what i would say is that i do think groups have their biases absolutely but the difference isnc some groups have the power to enforce those
about the united states. on 9/11 air-traffic controllers and guided every one of them to a safe landing in a little over an hour, try that. it s the kind of job or even a small mistake can lead instantly to the deaths of hundreds of people. not surprisingly, the hiring standardss for air traffic controllers were long among the most selective of all federal jobs. applicants typically needed to complete military service or pass the collegiate training initiativetr program, they sat r a specially designed exam to test for math ability and complex problem-solving. only those with the highest scores made the cut. the system was designed to choose the best and for decades it worked. then during the obama administration activist bureaucrats decided the pool of air traffic controllers wasn t diverse enough. they never explained why diversity ought to matter in air-traffic control or why it wasn t more important than traditional goals like confidence in public safety.